RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

MISCELLANEOUS

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  697  698  699  700  701  ...  750  751  »» 
AllSpark
Member
#10471 | Posted: 14 Jul 2016 18:45
Reply 
How much do you pay him for that info Joe ?
Joe
Member
#10472 | Posted: 14 Jul 2016 19:36
Reply 
AllSpark:
How much do you pay him for that info Joe ?

David Icke you mean? Icke can make sense on some things, but when he talks about shape shifting lizards (and he says he has never seen one himself), then he is talking theatre.
skipman
Member
#10473 | Posted: 16 Jul 2016 13:18
Reply 
skipman
Member
#10474 | Posted: 16 Jul 2016 22:14
Reply 
This video is like marmite. Some will love it others will go apoplectic. Which is why it was made.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeJ-iv3MOTo&oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatc h%3Fv%3DyeJ-iv3MOTo&has_verified=1
Joe
Member
#10475 | Posted: 18 Jul 2016 20:36 | Edited by: Joe
Reply 
Just look at this sham of a show from mainstream media and the way these moronic/childish presenters are treating David Icke! I only have a difficult time when Icke talks on the subject of shape-shifting lizards, but I would not take the superior position and mock the guest to gain self-popularity! Just look at the subliminal background scenery that has been put up as a further mockery, and to influence the viewer before David Icke even appears on the panel (fucking disgraceful). URL
skipman
Member
#10476 | Posted: 18 Jul 2016 21:37
Reply 
No wonder Richard does not do T.V. interviews.
nordsee220
Member
#10477 | Posted: 22 Jul 2016 19:26 | Edited by: nordsee220
Reply 
nordsee220:
I had a weird dream just as I was dropping off last night. I dreamt that the next FF venue was encoded in an old pop song by "M" - "Pop Musik".

The words go: New York, London, Paris, Munich, Everybody talk about pop musik.

Well we had NY 1st, then London. Perhaps the agenda now requires a shock to all of Europe, even the world and what more effective place than a certain resort that changed its name from Euro*****y to D********* Paris?

Bloody Hell. I wish I could go back to sharing dreams with Father Dougal McGuire, about Carol Vordeman.


OK, let's get back to sanity. (That's a laugh.)

Something I posted back on 19th September 2014 predicting the Paris and now Munich attacks after New York then London.

Some of the words are even creepier like "infiltrate it, activate it", "fix me a molotov" and "wanna be a gun slinger". The subway & disco references then making the headlines are also questionable at the very least.

Your livin' in a disco
Forget about the rat race

Infiltrate it
Activate it.

New York, London, Paris, Munich (they happened in that order)
Everybody talk about
Pop muzik

Singing in the subway
Shuffle with a shoe shine
Fix me a molotov
I'm on the headline

At the end of the song, "M" sing about "Lyin' in the tree".
Is that "telling untruths" or "hiding" and is the "tree" the heirachy?

EDIT 23 July

So today I "googled" "Is shoe polish explosive" and came up with Wikipedia suggesting Pentaerythritol tetranitrate. I searched the article for "shoe" and found references to the "shoe bomber".

Take a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentaerythritol_tetranitrate

The same search criteria brought up nitrobenzene https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrobenzene
I also found this interesting tidbit on shoe polish http://www.wired.com/2009/12/st_shoe_polish/
skipman
Member
#10478 | Posted: 24 Jul 2016 22:24
Reply 
The democrats have done their best to disrupt the republican convention. Now it is their turn.

The leaked democrat e-mails are going down well.

They have this film to look forward to watching too. The trailer has been viewed over 3,000,000 times.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7e6gLht6OQ
skipman
Member
#10479 | Posted: 24 Jul 2016 22:38
Reply 
skipman
Member
#10480 | Posted: 25 Jul 2016 21:19
Reply 
Re the Chilcott inquiry.

Till yesterday I had not heard of Katherine Gun. She was a translator working for GCGQ. .

Prior the the Iraq war the U.S. wanted the U.N. to give approval for Iraq's invasion htere by making it legal.

A number of countries were not for it,so the NSA asked GCHQ to tap the phones of the delegates concerned to see if they could gain some leverage.

When Ms gun came across the email she knew it was breaking the law, so blew the whistle.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/feb/25/iraq.pressandpublishing

Why has this not being brought up in the inquiry? Ms Gun did offer to give evidence but was turned down,why?
skipman
Member
#10481 | Posted: 26 Jul 2016 23:50
Reply 
When you play the "whose more racially diverse" card. Better be sure of your facts first.

http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/28246/

When it comes to politicians playing one up man ship,facts,real facts,never come into it.
quark1
Member
#10482 | Posted: 28 Jul 2016 09:45 | Edited by: quark1
Reply 
A bit of light relief with a serious message or two throughout


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUtikPtdT-s

In fact check out the rest of Martin Noakes' songs - all with quite powerful messages - perhaps a 'populist' way of getting the messages of truth through to the remaining doubters - who ten might go and seek further info.
Joe
Member
#10483 | Posted: 28 Jul 2016 12:17
Reply 
quark1:
A bit of light relief with a serious message or two throughout

The song has a serious message as you say, but I would have preferred if it did not sound so jolly; for me it takes the serious edge away and others may just treat it as an ordinary pop song to dance with, while not really listening to the massage.
nordsee220
Member
#10484 | Posted: 29 Jul 2016 21:31
Reply 
I looked at this week's show and though, "Hmmm..."

I then looked at show no 3 from way back in April 2010 and Richard doesn't look any older now in 2016 than he did then, more than 6 years later.

Hmmm.....
skipman
Member
#10485 | Posted: 29 Jul 2016 22:48 | Edited by: skipman
Reply 
There is a new youtube video abut the Clinton's and the cash that is funneled to them via the Clinton Foundation (over $100,000,000 was donated in one year,$7,000,000 was donated to various causes the rest went on wages travel and expenses. All tax free)

The media are not taking it up.Quelle surprise.

The media have been giving a lot of air time about the Russian sports doping. Getting quotes from all and sundry that the whole team should be banned from competing as an example to others.
I believe that is called collective punishment. The Nazi's and the Israeli's did and do that. It is supposed to be illegal.

I can see where there is a case, when a country is behind the falsification of tests of its athletes,it should be brought to the worlds attention and measures taken. The whole of the Chinese swimming team comes to mind. Were the other Chinese athletes censured?

The press have made a big deal that the information has come from insiders.

Do you recall that information of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction also came from insiders?

Take a closer look at the whistleblowers.

https://off-guardian.org/2016/07/25/the-olympics-as-a-tool-in-the-new-cold-war/

One could be forgiven for making a comparison between,alleged, Russian state involvement in helping their athletes win and the actual, supposedly neutral DNC. Cheating,lying and out right breaking the law to make sure Hillary got the nomination and not Bernie.

Forgive me for wondering why the press was not howling from the roof tops that Hillary should drop out or at the very least have an inquiry. Even Sky and the BBC never mentioned it,so much for unbiased news.

This is not the DNC'c fault its the Russian's. Apparently they are trying to influence who the next president of the US of a is going to be,by hacking and publishing their e-mail accounts.

The Russians are trying to fix who the next president will be by showing the world, how the democrats fixed who their nominee would be. How ironic.

The person who was in charge of getting Hillary the nomination,the head of the DNC,has stepped down. Hillary has hired her for her presidential campaign. Hillary said,"she is a dear and close friend"

Bernie's supporters are livid, Bernie is quiet,why?
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  697  698  699  700  701  ...  750  751  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®