RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

MISCELLANEOUS

 Page:  ««  1  2  3  4  5  ...  722  723  724  725  726  »» 
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#31 | Posted: 10 Jan 2009 23:29
Reply 
In my book I describe 7 of them in great detail. The TV series I have made also has an entire show dedicated to describing these 7 races. I will be uploading all 6 shows so they can be watched from the website. I aim to have this done early next week.

People who have given information about aliens include: Clifford Stone, Thomas Castello, Bob Dean, Robert Collins, Phil Schneider, Whitley Streiber, Al Beilik ... You could look these up on the net or on Richplanet.net

Richard
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#32 | Posted: 11 Jan 2009 14:49 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Here is a link to the programme about aliens,

Richplanet.net TV Programme - "Aliens"

Richard
CTRILEY
Member
#33 | Posted: 11 Jan 2009 17:39 | Edited by: CTRILEY
Reply 
As I watched it and here are some of my thoughts:

Alien feeding on blood = Origin of vampire?

ET's inhabit earth yet consider Humans squatters, sounds like a contradicition. What if reptiles evolved on Earth left to settle elsewhere, perhaps due to ice-age (which ended between 10,000 and 11,000 years ago), come back to find humans have gotten smart and taken over?
A species which looks like a dragon. References to dragons exist in every culture on this planet and no one knows why, all look more or less the same, all have six limbs, yet no remains found. Six limbs is important because (excluding a tail) all vertibrates have no more than four limbs (be it 4 legs, 2 legs & 2 arms or 2 legs & 2 wings), dragons have 6 limbs (4 legs & 2 wings). Humans, Greys, Nordics, etc., all vertibrates with 4 limbs. They only ones with 6 limbs (2 arms, 2 legs & 2 wings) look like dragons. What if they don't look like dragons, but are dragons?
telecaster
Member
#34 | Posted: 15 Jan 2009 19:52
Reply 
I think the origin of the vampire is far more spiritual but I know where you are coming from.
To me, I think the reptiles are the demons and devils of past myths because they are underground and E.T.s like Pleiadians are angels from above/heaven !
Could solve a few legends.
Simon
Seth Haniel
Member
#35 | Posted: 18 Jan 2009 14:30
Reply 
I did an article back in the 70's linking 'Vampires' with 'Ley Lines' and the similarities

i.e. burying Vampires at crossroads with stakes through hearts
Ley lines tend to cross at crossroads and 'Bad leys' could be treated by iron rods being staked into the ground at cross roads to make them good -

-and UFOs tending to use Ley Lines for their route??

A lot of connections there for the finding

;)
CTRILEY
Member
#36 | Posted: 18 Jan 2009 19:28 | Edited by: CTRILEY
Reply 
Interesting to should meantion iron rods, because within myth and folklore iron was always the metal to fight evil (with Christianity it became silver), whilst those carrying iron could not be affected or attacked by evil forces (demons. etc).
telecaster
Member
#37 | Posted: 18 Jan 2009 22:24
Reply 
I wonder if iron has some effect on reptillians ?
Probably not and I don`t want to find out !!!!!
Interesting about leys and ufos.......
the only possible ufo I`ve seen was while on a ley !
I didn`t realise it was a ley until later on.
telecaster
Member
#38 | Posted: 20 Jan 2009 14:49
Reply 
Is it me or have NASA made an almighty cock up ?
I saw the footage from the first Apollo moon landing on
telly the other day and one thing struck me.......
the part where the Eagle leaves the lunar surface.
The camera that filmed this event panned upwards
to follow the leaving craft !!!!!
How did it do this unless somebody was holding the camera ?
Was somebody left on the moon to do this or was there someone there already ?
How did the film reach the earth ?
Can anybody help with these questions please ?
Dave Hall
Member
#39 | Posted: 20 Jan 2009 15:44
Reply 
And have you noticed just how good the quality is , compared to the video take by the astronaughts themselves???
Dave
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#40 | Posted: 20 Jan 2009 16:50 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Watch this TV Programme from Edge Media. None of the footage put out by NASA was filmed on the moon. I still personally think they may have landed or perhaps just orbited, but they could not use photographs & film that they took - either because there were things on the surface they could not show us, or just that the original pictures were rubbish. Non of the cameras they used had view finders, and the quality of the pictures they published looked like they had been taken by professional photographers.

Watch Progamme here about moon landings.

When they got back at the Press Conference, Patrick Moore asked Neil Armstrong (who is a keen astronomer), if he saw any stars when they were on the moon, he replied "I don't recall what stars we could see."

Also watch this, it is the full press conference when the Astronauts returned.

Apollo 11 Press Conference

It is blatantly obvious that these men are hiding something. They sit there like scared schoolboys. If I had just been to the moon, and got back alive, I would be the proudest, cockiest, happiest person on the Earth. What are they scared of? What are the hiding?
CTRILEY
Member
#41 | Posted: 20 Jan 2009 18:25 | Edited by: CTRILEY
Reply 
The cameras used by the astronuats were the best avaible at the time (Hasselblad or something like that) they were given to them to use months before they went up so that they knew how to use them. The photo negatives on dosmestic camera are small, whilst those of the on the camera used are large to get a incredible level of detail and designed in such a fashion that pressing one big button did all the work.

Patrick Moore did ask the question but he was being retorical and followed his question up by telling people that you can't see stars from the moon just for the same reason you can't see them during the day. They can't be seen because of the light of the Sun.

I saw a documentary in which one man recreated the landing area in giant airhanger, using only one source of light and he disproved every claim made by those who cliamed NASA never went there. Equally one of the experiments the performed was to place a prism on the moon so it could be hit by a laser, thus finding the distance for the earth to the moon. This laser has been fired at this target on average 200 times a year since the Apollo 11 and no moon landing denier has ever mentioned it or ever gone to the observertry to see it.

Equally understand this:

1) Since all communications was monitored by Russia had anything been faked they'd have exploited it to the full.

2) When a something is top secret and people are near their death they talk (to clear their conscience, before making peace with their God), which in turn causes others to start talking (look at Roswell, Bletchley Park, etc. for example). But nearly 1,000,000 people were involved in getting man to the moon and the only claims come from those either sacked from NASA or who are bitter because they were kicked out of the astronaunt program and have the attitude of "it should have been me, not him". Since it occured during the Nixon era anything which occured under him has since been questioned and claimed as a conspiracy by a lot of people.

I seem to recall that the crew of Apollo 11 took a photograph of a UFO on the Moon, whilst still in orbit. Equally isn't there something about one of the Apollo misison seeing bases on the Moon? Either way, upon landing Gov. agents would have had a word with them to frighten them. Thus, under those circumstances who wouldn't be careful about what they said?
telecaster
Member
#42 | Posted: 20 Jan 2009 21:37
Reply 
Just watched the Edge TV programme about the moon landings
and could only watch part of the press conference as it was too painful !
I can now say that the afore mentioned film of the craft leaving the
lunar surface was filmed in the Sea of Tranquility, Arizona.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#43 | Posted: 21 Jan 2009 11:14 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Russia and the US were working together.

In 1979, Maurice Chatelain, former chief of NASA Communications Systems confirmed that Armstrong had indeed reported seeing two UFOs on the rim of a crater. "The encounter was common knowledge in NASA," he revealed, "but nobody has talked about it until now."

Soviet scientists were allegedly the first to confirm the incident. "According to our information, the encounter was reported immediately after the landing of the module," said Dr. Vladimir Azhazha, a physicist and Professor of Mathematics at Moscow University. "Neil Armstrong relayed the message to Mission Control that two large, mysterious objects were watching them after having landed near the moon module. But his message was never heard by the public-because NASA censored it. "

According to another Soviet scientist, Dr. Aleksandr Kazantsev, Buzz Aldrin took color movie film of the UFOs from inside the module, and continued filming them after he and Armstrong went outside. Dr. Azhazha claims that the UFOs departed minutes after the astronauts came out on to the lunar surface.

Maurice Chatelain also confirmed that Apollo 11's radio transmissions were interrupted on several occasions in order to hide the news from the public.

Also if you read the document I mentioned in a previous entry, a transcript of the House of Lords debate in 1979 on UFOs.

Read it Here

The Earl of Kimberley states :
It has been reported that the United States and the USSR signed a pact in 1971 to swop UFO information, but the pact stated that they were to keep the rest of the world in the dark. I believe that the pact was signed so that neither super-Power would make mistakes about UFOs being atomic missiles. I am also led to understand that quite recently the three United States balloonists who crossed the Atlantic were followed for up to 12 1257 hours by UFOs but were ordered by United States Government agents not to discuss them.

Russia and America were collaberating all through the "cold war".
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#44 | Posted: 21 Jan 2009 11:21
Reply 
CTRILEY:
Gov. agents would have had a word with them to frighten them. Thus, under those circumstances who wouldn't be careful about what they said?

Another tac-tic,is they also threaten to kill your children, spouse etc if you say anything. The reason they do this is to prevent death bed confessions.
CTRILEY
Member
#45 | Posted: 21 Jan 2009 14:19 | Edited by: CTRILEY
Reply 
 Page:  ««  1  2  3  4  5  ...  722  723  724  725  726  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®