RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

GEO ENGINEERING | SCALAR WEAPONS | CHEM TRAILS

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  59  60  61  62  63  ...  70  71  »» 
SPIRAL
Member
#901 | Posted: 12 Oct 2012 22:09 | Edited by: SPIRAL
Reply 
A long time ago i talked of seeing "contrails" separate into different trails, well I made a video of this today.URL

dreamkatcher
Member
#902 | Posted: 16 Oct 2012 13:04
Reply 
CHEMTRAiLS_ MORGELLONS KiLLS!!!!!!! MUST SEE!!!!!!! 100% MAINSTREAM MEDIA
www.youtube.com
Time to wake everybody up....the establishment cannot keep a lid on the obvious forever. Stonewalling the public, officially denied by the establishment but ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wFTkuf6pST0#!
nordsee220
Member
#903 | Posted: 18 Oct 2012 13:24
Reply 
38 Degrees says: ( http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/m/74c05274/2d52c793/5d1dda18/467de229/3650184595/VEs H/ )

British bees are in danger. Three species of bees are already extinct and others are in rapid decline. Strong evidence points to particular pesticides being to blame for killing them. [1] This week we have a chance to persuade the government to protect our bees and ban these harmful pesticides

Is it really so difficult to put 1 + 1 together and make 2?
MONSANTO want to control all seed production.
Is it therefore likely that they'd wipe out the bees so that mechanically fertilised plants are just about the only ones producing seeds?


And which MP's will prove they're not just prostitutes in suits by stating the bloody obvious?
MK_DON
Guest
#904 | Posted: 29 Oct 2012 10:37
Reply 
Can anyone verify the information on this website re Sandy being steered/geo-engineered... It's well above my pay grade...
http://chemtrailsplanet.net/
MK_DON
Guest
#905 | Posted: 29 Oct 2012 14:27 | Edited by: MK_DON
Reply 
Unfortunately the majority of the Daily Mail readers are showing their ignorance.. but credit the staff at the mail for allowing my comments to appear
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2224629/Hurricane-Sandy-path-2012-How-Franken storm-created.html?offset=0&max=100#comment-20976167

Speaking of which.. How big a problem is wilful ignorance..
I mentioned the 1976 UN Weather Weapon treaty signed in Geneva during a coffee break at work today.. it was dismissed as total conspiracy theory.. so i brought up the treaty & said 'if you dont believe me that it exists then have a look at it'..
Response - 'I don't want to look at it...'

Now I am not saying that the fact there is even a treaty regarding the use of weather weapons proves that one is being used right now to affect or delay the US election... But I do find that the people who instantly dismiss the possibility are too close minded to even look at the proof that there is a UN Treaty to regulate weather warfare. Am I wrong?
wensam
Member
#906 | Posted: 29 Oct 2012 14:57
Reply 
MK_DON:
But I do find that the people who instantly dismiss the possibility are too close minded to even look at the proof that there is a UN Treaty to regulate weather warfare. Am I wrong?

I read that there was a bill passed in 1977 saying weather modification was not to be used for such purposes- I could be wrong...
MK_DON
Guest
#907 | Posted: 29 Oct 2012 15:06 | Edited by: MK_DON
Reply 
wensam:
I read that there was a bill passed in 1977 saying weather modification was not to be used for such purposes- I could be wrong...

Correct - As per my disliked comments on the DM website
(I've got 40 likes opposed to 76 dislikes today - so there are a good %age that are aware of the facts re the UN treaty and HAARP ;o)

The Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD), formally the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques is an international treaty prohibiting the military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques. It opened for signature on 18 May 1977 in Geneva and entered into force on 5 October 1978. The Convention bans weather warfare, which is the use of weather modification techniques for the purposes of inducing damage or destruction.

Now here is the laugh.... my understanding is that the UN Treaty prevents the use of weather weapons against another country... but there is nothing to say you cannot use it against your own (to win an election?!) as that was too nuts to even be considered when drafting the treaty!
MK_DON
Guest
#908 | Posted: 29 Oct 2012 15:11
Reply 
From the History channel - Commander Riker re how HAARP creates Hurricanes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo-T_KvLNdQ
Kozmik
Member
#909 | Posted: 29 Oct 2012 19:31
Reply 
My first thought when I saw the msm reporting of the storm about to hit america, was HAARP
MK_DON
Guest
#910 | Posted: 29 Oct 2012 19:52 | Edited by: MK_DON
Reply 
Kozmik:
My first thought when I saw the msm reporting of the storm about to hit america, was HAARP

If it were man made they might drop some clues - like naming it after a man made monster... Franken......

It can't be....
http://www.weca.org/SET/report/node6.html
skipman
Member
#911 | Posted: 29 Oct 2012 21:48
Reply 
MK_DON:
like naming it after a man made monster... Franken......

When they named it a Frankenstien storm I was thinking it was because of Haloween . Yours is a much better interpretation MK
MK_DON
Guest
#912 | Posted: 30 Oct 2012 09:22 | Edited by: MK_DON
Reply 
Kozmik:
HAARP

http://theintelhub.com/2012/10/27/engineered-storm-haarp-monitoring-project-records-s trongest-readings-ever-directed-in-path-of-hurricane-sandy/
these readings seem to indicate that some sort of engineering of the storm has taken place whether or not it was to push the storm into the country or away from it remains up to the reader to decide.

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2012/10/us-presidential-elections-is-haarp-steering- sandy-2440172.html

Don't know how accurate these artilces are re the readings - but if accurate - what do you think?
MK_DON
Guest
#913 | Posted: 30 Oct 2012 11:05 | Edited by: MK_DON
Reply 
Interesting site... I'm way too underqualified to comment on the articles re Sandy...
http://jimstonefreelance.com/

What I will say is that I am in no doubt that the comment re bin Laden is correct... which makes a bloody change given the amount of alternative media outlets that punt other versions...
MK_DON
Guest
#914 | Posted: 30 Oct 2012 16:56 | Edited by: MK_DON
Reply 
OMG (that's goodness ;o)
The Daily Mail allowed me to post this re 911 and Hurricane Erin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F87vtgZjjc

&
this re todays man made monster?!

A natural hurricane then, gets all of it's boost from the negative pressure caused by the rising WARM AND WET air at the eye wall, and this negative boost originates at the surface of the ocean. So the winds in a natural hurricane are built from the surface of the water, all the way up the eye wall by air that is both WARM AND WET A haarp storm functions differently. Instead of having warm moist air rising from the surface of the ocean that is damp and therefore lightweight to begin with (a double rise potential) , a weather mod machine warms a column of air across a distance spanning from a few hundred feet off the surface of the water, to many miles in altitude. The combined negative pressure is built in a zone starting thousands of feet up and never quite reaching the surface of the water. Interesting it is then that Sandy built up strength as it approached land, where the weather machines work the best.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2225108/Hurricane-Sandy-2012-Obama-declares-m ajor-disaster-New-York-33-people-die-Superstorm.html

That's two days in a row they've allowed my comments
wensam
Member
#915 | Posted: 30 Oct 2012 17:37
Reply 
MK_DON:
That's two days in a row they've allowed my comments

WOW! Congrats- careful they don't set you up as an intellectual patsie ;) lol
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  59  60  61  62  63  ...  70  71  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®