RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

GEO ENGINEERING | SCALAR WEAPONS | CHEM TRAILS

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  4  5  6  7  8  ...  70  71  »» 
Starseed
Guest
#76 | Posted: 12 Nov 2010 22:56
Reply 
Can the last one to leave turn the lights out...
dreamkatcher
Member
#77 | Posted: 13 Nov 2010 07:01
Reply 
Starseed:
So? what is going on then?

Reply - Quote - and? GONE

mmmm.

As Ive said before, you will get rid of anyone who disagrees with you. Im NOT name-calling, just having a "discussion" as you put it. Ive not stooped to your level.

Time you grew up.
Starseed
Guest
#78 | Posted: 13 Nov 2010 07:09
Reply 
dreamkatcher:
As Ive said before, you will get rid of anyone who disagrees with you. Im NOT name-calling, just having a "discussion"

Wrong. I will show up any stupid, dim witted rubbish copied and pasted from other fearmongering websites and dumped on here.

If you would like to discuss the 'merit' of your post - linking to the chemtrail patents (which are not) then fine, defend them. If not just carry on as normal. i.e. Copy something else which has no basis and fill up another yard of page and move on, again. After slagging me off of course for pointing out what a pile of utter rubbish you posted, again.
dreamkatcher
Member
#79 | Posted: 13 Nov 2010 10:08
Reply 
Its only a short while since you said you werent going to answer any of my posts again!

Memory gone again?

Im just quoting you...
Starseed
Guest
#80 | Posted: 13 Nov 2010 13:12 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
dreamkatcher:
Its only a short while since you said you werent going to answer any of my posts again!

Memory gone again?

Im just quoting you...

Unless you are posting articles that are utter twaddle. Some people might believe some of that worthless fearmongering about chemtrail patents, they may think it is a fact. When it is not. As I just pointed out. For balance. Here:

6110590 August 29, 2000 Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same

Oooh, 'nanofibres' scary...

'A way of manufacturing synthetic silk. - SILK? - this list was cobbled together to make gullible chemtards think that 'nanofiber' would have to be something secret and sinister? It's not nearly as sinister as someone deliberately posting misleading information in order to persuade you that chemtrails exist.

6056203 May 2, 2000 Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds

This one looks good - Modifying supercooled clouds. Scary. Except supercooled clouds are those that contain liquid water which is at a temperature lower than 0 degrees C. This patent is for introducing ice to clouds to force precipitation.

Misleading information should be shown up as such. You were not the only one gullible enough to fall for these lies mind you. You should be glad I pointed it out, so you know that you have NOT been had. Cheers!
dark star
Member
#81 | Posted: 13 Nov 2010 18:48
Reply 
Starseed:
articles that are utter twaddle. Some people might believe some of that worthless fearmongering about chemtrail patents, they may think it is a fact. When it is not. As I just pointed out. For balance. Here:

6110590 August 29, 2000 Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same

Oooh, 'nanofibres' scary...

'A way of manufacturing synthetic silk. - SILK? - this list was cobbled together to make gullible chemtards think that 'nanofiber' would have to be something secret and sinister? It's not nearly as sinister as someone deliberately posting misleading information in order to persuade you that chemtrails exist.

6056203 May 2, 2000 Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds

This one looks good - Modifying supercooled clouds. Scary. Except supercooled clouds are those that contain liquid water which is at a temperature lower than 0 degrees C. This patent is for introducing ice to clouds to force precipitation.

Misleading information should be shown up as such. You were not the only one gullible enough to fall for these lies mind you. You should be glad I pointed it out, so you know that you have NOT been had. Cheers!

Well said Seedy.
I think that you should be our leader,the truth movement needs someone like you.
Starseed
Guest
#82 | Posted: 13 Nov 2010 20:39
Reply 
Well ? Thanks, but. I think Richard should be running the TRUTH PARTY. (he has the face for it)

FACTS - that the sheep can NOT ignore or 'gloss over' .
Starseed
Guest
#83 | Posted: 13 Nov 2010 21:00 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
dark star:
Well said Seedy.
I think that you should be our leader,the truth movement needs someone like you.

No - one 'needs me'. I`m paid by MI5 or 6? to discredit or whatever -' Persistant contrails' - LOL!

I take it that you looked up some of the many 'chemtrail patents' and found that the whole thing was NOTHING more than scaremongering SHITE ?

Well done for you - And a 'result' for actual FACTS as well as TRUTH. Cheers!
dreamkatcher
Member
#84 | Posted: 15 Nov 2010 14:59
Reply 
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

Parliamentary acts
04:03 pm - Monday
European Parliament: question on aircraft condensation trails which no longer
only contain water
Strasbourg, France - By Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL)

(WAPA) - "Written question E-2455/07
by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL)
to the Commission

Subject: aircraft condensation trails which no longer only contain water but
cause persistent milky veils, possibly due to the presence of barium, aluminium
and iron

1) Is the Commission aware that, since 1999, members of the public in Canada and
the USA have been complaining about the growing presence in the air of aircraft
condensation trails of a new type, which sometimes persist for hours and which
spread far more widely than in the past, creating milky veils which are dubbed
'aerial obscuration', and that the new type has particularly come to people's
attention because it is so different from the short, pencil-thin white contrails
which have been a familiar sight ever since jet engines came into use and which
remain visible for 20 minutes at most and can only be produced if steam
condenses on dust particles due to low temperatures and high humidity?

2) Is the Commission aware that investigations by these complainants,
observations by pilots and statements by government bodies increasingly suggest
that what is happening is that aircraft are emitting into dry air small
particles consisting of barium, aluminium and iron, a phenomenon which in public
debate in America has come to be known as chemtrails?

3) Unlike contrails, chemtrails are not an inevitable by-product of modern
aviation. Does the Commission know, therefore, what is the purpose of
artificially emitting these Earth-derived substances into the Earth's
atmosphere? Does it help to cause rain, benefit telecommunications or combat
climate change?

4) To what extent are aerial obscuration and chemtrails now also being employed
in the air over Europe, bearing in mind that many people here too are now
convinced that the phenomenon is becoming increasingly common and are becoming
concerned about the fact that little is so far known about it and there is no
public information on the subject? Who initiates this spraying and how is it
funded?

5) Apart from the intended benefits of emitting substances into the air, is the
Commission aware of any possible disadvantages it may have for the environment,
public health, aviation and TV reception?

6) What is being done to prevent individual European states or businesses from
taking measures unilaterally whose crossborder impact other States or citizens'
organisations may regard as undesirable? Is coordination already taking place
with regard to this? Is the EU playing a part in it, or does the Commission
anticipate a future role, and what are the Commission's objectives in this
connection?". (Avionews)
(006)
070730160329-1077601
(World Aeronautical Press Agency - 2007-07-30 04:03 pm)
dreamkatcher
Member
#85 | Posted: 15 Nov 2010 15:35
Reply 
Starseed
Guest
#86 | Posted: 15 Nov 2010 15:50
Reply 
Some good questions from 2007. What were the answers from the EU?
dreamkatcher
Member
#87 | Posted: 15 Nov 2010 15:54
Reply 
Am waiting for reply.



Wednesday, November 2
Flu Symptoms


Have you seen the trails today? My throat is raspy, my lungs feel infected. Do you feel it? Do you see it? The other night on air, I recieved much concern about the chemtrails after I asked these questions. Numerous callers wanted to know more. I wish I had told one lady in particular, about how I came to know of chemtrails. So, here is that lost thought. I started noticing the trails in the sky in the early 90's. At first, I thought they were rocket launches of some sort. I grew up near Cape Canaveral and rocket launches are the only thing I had ever seen that look like this, but the trails criss-crossed. This made no sense. I then started hearing reports of a silvery, spider-web type substance falling from the sky onto people's lawns. They, in their curiousity, picked the stuff up. It immediately ,melted in the hands of these unsuspecting citizens. They developed flu-like symptoms. Next thing you knew, we had a "flu-like symptom epidemic". The news reported that there was no virus connected to these symptoms and left it for you to wonder just what was going on. I then saw a news report of 1000's of birds suddenly dropping dead in Kansas City. They gave this a whole minute and a half of air play, after a few people saying, "it's gross" the news left you with, "it might be poison." Soon, many knew of chemtrails and their effects and wanted to share this with the world. People were not seeing them, however. How could this be, with massive X's in the sky, sometimes full on grid patterns like today. So, we watched and would actually get excited when we saw them in commercials and movies. Much effort has gone into trying to discover what is in these trails and who is putting them up there. And, yes this is world wide. The most likely source is NATO, and the most logical conclusion is that it is population culling. Researchers have discovered that pathogens have been placed in these trails. They are dormant. These can, absolutely, be activated by HAARP type technologies. Barium was also discovered in the trails. This is a known tracking agent and is known to cause flu-like symptoms. Barium makes you show up on radar. Like the new X-radar on its way to Alaska at this moment. So, if you are feeling a lttle "under the weather", look up and see why.
11/02/2005 12:46:00 PM
dreamkatcher
Member
#88 | Posted: 15 Nov 2010 16:01
Reply 
Starseed
Guest
#89 | Posted: 15 Nov 2010 16:11
Reply 
dreamkatcher:
sometimes full on grid patterns like today.

From 2005. Like these:
all the air traffic in UK airspace in a 24 hour period. That involved mapping the positions of 7,500 aircraft, showing how they crisscross the UK:



Or these in the US:



So hardly surprising (IMO) that they would see something like this: (or worse)



dreamkatcher:
and the most logical conclusion is that it is population culling.

If it is population culling - here`s a thought - people in the UK are living longer than ever before aren`t they? So it`s not working very well.
Starseed
Guest
#90 | Posted: 15 Nov 2010 16:27
Reply 
I read all the time about Barium 'found' in chemtrails. No actual proof of any kind is documented is it? When you look for information about them on the internet, half the sites that turn up are about a conspiracy theory which claims that any trail that last more than a few minutes is actually a "chemtrail", comprised of dangerous chemicals, particularly barium. So why no actual proof?

Even when some sites - like the 'Arizona skywatch site' try to provide some actual proof - they get it wrong. Take, for example, this graph found on the Arizona Skywatch site:



look at the first column. It shows a concentration of barium in the air of 556,000 ppb (parts per billion), vs. a "Toxic Limit" of 2,000 ppb. Clearly something is terribly wrong, we've got nearly 600 times the toxic limit of Barium in the air. Why are people not dropping dead all over Phoenix?

The first mistake is the value used for "Toxic Limit". 2000 ppb is actually the EPS's limit for barium in water, not in air. The limit for barium in air is 5 mg/m3 according to the OSHA.

The science continues but I won`t bore you with it... It goes on to say something quite interesting about what is going on:

"When I wrote the above in 2008 I thought that Arizona Skywatch would at least remove the results from their page. But instead they left them there for a year, and then, unbelievably, they repeated the tests using the exact same methodology with the same results.:"



Incredibly bad science.

So why?
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  4  5  6  7  8  ...  70  71  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®