RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

GEO ENGINEERING | SCALAR WEAPONS | CHEM TRAILS

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  10  11  12  13  14  ...  70  71  »» 
ImOverHere
Member
#166 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 20:42
Reply 
Starseed:
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=23&part=1

I'm going to watch it again tonight. Got a lot of time for Ian (as long as he doesn't sing Frankie Goes To Hollywood - cringe)
Starseed
Guest
#167 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 20:58
Reply 
ImOverHere:
I'm going to watch it again tonight. Got a lot of time for Ian (as long as he doesn't sing Frankie Goes To Hollywood - cringe)

It`s a bloody eye opener if it`s true - and he seems to be telling the truth as he knows it (to me). Enjoy IOH ...
dreamkatcher
Member
#168 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 21:38
Reply 
jamesvoyce
Member
#169 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 21:53
Reply 
This should be on national tv,but somehow i don't think it will lol.
ImOverHere
Member
#170 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 22:13
Reply 
By the same guy - a well constructed and valid arguement that should not be dismissed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9SGw75pVas&feature=related
Starseed
Guest
#171 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 22:29 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
ImOverHere:
By the same guy - a well constructed and valid arguement that should not be dismissed.

mmmmm. Same guy. Shity You Tube video? mmmm .


SPPI - If ignorance is bliss don`t read it or visit. You would fail to understand the information anyway. Better off with anything from you tube for you then...?

"2010 was the Warmest Year on Record"

Michael Steketee, writing in The Australian in January 2011, echoed the BBC (whose journalists' pension fund is heavily weighted towards "green" "investments") and other climate-extremist vested interests in claiming that 2010 was the warmest year on record worldwide. Mr. Steketee's short article makes two dozen questionable assertions, which either require heavy qualification or are downright false. His assertions will be printed in bold face: the truth will appear in Roman face.

OR

December 2010 - A December to Remember

December was indeed a December to Remember (or for many, to forget!) with widespread cold and snows. The Central England Temperature record is one of the longest continuous temperature records in the world extending back to the Little Ice age in 1659. December 2010 was the Second Coldest December Temperature in the entire record (352 years) with an average of -0.7C just short of the record of -0.8C recorded in December 1890.

OR

Alarming Warming?

Four cold winters in a row ought to have raised questions in legislators' minds about the competence of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC, which they have generously but unwisely funded and trusted. The IPCC's dire predictions of dangerous warming are not happening in observed reality.

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/

I`ll take your BBC Brainwashing and your Eastenders Programming and your shitty YouTube vids and raise you facts, disinfo, social control, world control, taxation, lies, fraud, manipulation MSM propaganda and way more besides. If you want to debate Monckton then do it properly. Lets have your facts that the Earth is indeed warming due to man made carbon emissions and more stuff on Monckton please.

Start with Global temps for the last 10 years, then we will get into the history of it. Ready? I am.

Finally. (rubs hands together in anticipation) LOL
ImOverHere
Member
#172 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 22:44
Reply 
I posted the video for information as per the description so climb back in your tree solspunk.
jamesvoyce
Member
#173 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 22:47
Reply 
He is the man lol.I love all the graphs and maths and can't find a fault in it.
Damn angry that the average sheep can't understand this bloke and the government love this fact.
Starseed
Guest
#174 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 22:55 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
ImOverHere:
I posted the video for information as per the description so climb back in your tree solspunk.

What? Information? Eh?

Been drinking or what?

If you want to give up fine. I thought you were actually trying to make a point. And as you see - unlike others - I don`t 'boo hoo' when people I link to are challenged. I stand by the integrity of my post and will defend the information in robust debate.

Monckton - if you could concentrate on the talk - would inform you of the reason (or part reason) that developing countries are being bribed with our money to not dig themselves out of the shit they are in. No small point, but one which the msm will never tell you and one which you seem to want to overlook? So put up or shut up. Piss poor vids from youtube won`t dig you out of the weight of logic on this one. Crystal strokers yes. Facts no.

Does this mean the debate about Monckton is over? I hope not. I can do this for as long as you like.

And " solspunk" WTF? Name calling? I thought you were better than that. Don`t sink to the level of others. Just stick to the info in the post.
Starseed
Guest
#175 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 22:58 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
jamesvoyce:
He is the man lol.I love all the graphs and maths and can't find a fault in it.
Damn angry that the average sheep can't understand this bloke and the government love this fact.

James

Are you referring to Monckton ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zOXmJ4jd-8

Is it not compelling viewing? I thought exactly the same as you on my first 2nd and 3rd viewings.

They would never dare put this on mainstream TV. Maybe Richard could get it shown?
dreamkatcher
Member
#176 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 23:03
Reply 
IOH,

I warned you, he likes you as long as you agree with him ! lol

ss,

PROOF

http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=average+te mperatures+in+2010.+++++Hottest+summer%3F

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1259685/UK-hottest-summer-predicts-Positive- Weather-Solutions.html

i dont want to "play" now...
jamesvoyce
Member
#177 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 23:06
Reply 
Yea Monckton.
I have seen evidence before proving it is all a con,but this guy seems to totally destroy the global warming theory with his evidence and logic.
ImOverHere
Member
#178 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 23:11 | Edited by: ImOverHere
Reply 
solspunk
I'm not blinkered by a single polarised stance on this subject and note the presented data on levels of solar radiation. This is not an arguement and counter arguement subject it is down to interpretation of the data as presented. There is a big difference between knowing and believing that cannot be resolved by reacting like a religous zealot. Choose your data and make your choice but keep an open mind. I'm well aware of the powers that be have exploited the data in respect of the climate agenda. As I said - climb back in your tree, no wonder you piss people off.
Starseed
Guest
#179 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 23:12
Reply 
Anyone who wants to debate my posts can do so.
I will defend the information and links that I post.
I will not run and hide (unlike some)
I will also not post a debunking article then run away like a child (like some)

The key is (and some can`t handle this) If you post something and you can not, or will not, or refuse to, or unable to defend it, under even mild scrutiny, then fuck off in the first place because you are posting shit. Get it (now stay away from me like I told you to before please. You know who you are - you fit my profile of a bullshitter and I will continue to ignore you fully, thank you).
Starseed
Guest
#180 | Posted: 11 Jan 2011 23:15
Reply 
jamesvoyce:
Yea Monckton.
I have seen evidence before proving it is all a con,but this guy seems to totally destroy the global warming theory with his evidence and logic.

Too right - plenty of other stuff on YT from US TV interviews. The SPPI (links above) have regular updates. He is also the guy that Al Gore refuses to debate. Wonder why? LOL

Cheers JV
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  10  11  12  13  14  ...  70  71  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®