RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

ORIGINS OF LIFE | EVOLUTION | INTELLIGENT DESIGN

 Page:  ««  1  2  3  ...  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  »» 
AllSpark
Member
#391 | Posted: 19 Feb 2013 20:13
Reply 
wensam:
I watched this today- Athene's Theory of Everything.

interesting wensam....... brainwaves.....braincells....oscillating frquencies....alpha, theta,gamma... yardee yardee yar.....
Are these things all pointing towards the same conclusion ?
Kozmik:
and the twat said something like, "The universe is expanding"

Then comes along this guy with more evidence of the 'matrix','bosson field', 'lattice', 'Grid',etc etc ( same thing isn't it)
URL
Fractal space, Fractal time..... yardee yardee yar.
Seems to me that there are two options here. The 'Grid' is intelligent design and is the natural universe or the 'Grid' is intelligent design and was put here ( for whatever reason ). One thing i do know, it uses laws of math ( and all its branches)to exist. Further investigation to find out which, me thinks.
AllSpark
Member
#392 | Posted: 20 Feb 2013 17:17 | Edited by: AllSpark
Reply 
This probably gives an idea of what it 'could' look like..... depending on what goggles you have ;)
URL
warning
Do Not try to download this guys 'poster' document.
He wants phone numbers ?
AllSpark
Member
#393 | Posted: 20 Feb 2013 20:26 | Edited by: AllSpark
Reply 
And just to finish off on this point ( whatever that is lol )
Marko Rodin
URL
glad i saw this cos it has changed my mind on a few things.
Just listen to his claims in this interview.
URL
wensam
Member
#394 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 11:40
Reply 
Yeah, well moving on..... sacred geometry of the body imprinted on the layout of the Temple at Luxor- this is fascinating- lovely ideas about the temples as themselves which were the vehicle for the teaching- adorned with visuals and ideas.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Bv_g2BG4mM
ImOverHere
Member
#395 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 12:14
Reply 
wensam:
Yeah, well moving on..... sacred geometry of the body imprinted on the layout of the Temple at Luxor- this is fascinating- lovely ideas about the temples as themselves which were the vehicle for the teaching- adorned with visuals and ideas.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Bv_g2BG4mM

Thanks wensam, watching it now.
AllSpark
Member
#396 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 17:11
Reply 
wensam:
sacred geometry of the body imprinted on the layout of the Temple at Luxor

Nope, sorry, couldn't see it. Unless you meant at 11:46 when he goes through the chakras and the heart is 'in the wrong place'. The heart is not as high as this bloke shows it, so IMO this is a load of bollocks. The temple is not a layout of a human figure. This is a good example of so called scholars trying to force square pegs into round holes to fit the theory. I watched 15 minutes ( thats half way through )of this and did not see a shred of evidence. Just a load of waffle about nothing.
Sorry Wensam
wensam
Member
#397 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 18:00
Reply 
AllSpark:
so IMO this is a load of bollocks.

Thanks for your considered opinion AllSpark :) it's always a pleasure :)))))
i still like the idea, many buildings have correlations and symbolic correspondences with the body, the word atrium, hall and heart, the proportions of a lot of the buildings of Charle Rennie McIntosh. I will keep an open mind, as ever....
AllSpark
Member
#398 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 18:08
Reply 
wensam:
I will keep an open mind, as ever....

:) as you wish :)
wensam
Member
#399 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 18:32
Reply 
AllSpark:
:) as you wish :)

Oh... thanks ;)
Are you not a 'builder' sir?
thought you might enlighten me via your experience as to why the Luxor thing is nonsense?
AllSpark
Member
#400 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 20:40
Reply 
wensam:
thought you might enlighten me

Only you can do that Wensam
wensam
Member
#401 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 21:04
Reply 
AllSpark:

Only you can do that Wensam

Hahaha, true, but sometimes a little encouragement goes a long way.
AllSpark
Member
#402 | Posted: 25 Feb 2013 21:31 | Edited by: AllSpark
Reply 
have a listen to this wensam. From the all knowing BBC.
Talking about a new find in Egypt to do with Ramesses II ( also known as Necho II in the bible)
Just listen to the tone of the reporters. Wait till you come across their math skills ! Incredible !
But wait.......... the best bit at the end is even better when the so called expert states that " the exodus is not historical".. what ?......... bloody nora, don't tell Wilson & Blackett.
URL

what sort of fu****g reporting is this ?
wensam
Member
#403 | Posted: 26 Feb 2013 12:55
Reply 
AllSpark:
what sort of fu****g reporting is this ?

Not very confident- he couldn't even get the dates right in translation- a Professor!!!
Let's face it most if not all of the Egyptologists we see in the msm are not telling the full story- it's a hugely corrupted area, which is why i am happy to read as much as poss.

It's the geometry im interested in these days- which is why i liked the one about the temple of Luxor being akin to the human body- it gets away from the usual.
Many thanks AllSpark
ImOverHere
Member
#404 | Posted: 1 Mar 2013 11:33 | Edited by: ImOverHere
Reply 
Just had this link sent to me. It has allways sat comfortably with me that there may of been some sort of intelligent intervention somewhere along the way but this guy spends 3hrs debunking the notion:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ&feature=player_embedded
AllSpark
Member
#405 | Posted: 1 Mar 2013 21:21 | Edited by: AllSpark
Reply 
ImOverHere:
Just had this link sent to me. It has allways sat comfortably with me that there may of been some sort of intelligent intervention somewhere along the way but this guy spends 3hrs debunking the notion:-

An important film to watch....... whatever our opinion is beforehand, there is some important evidence in this which will probably change a few viewpoints.
That's not to say i agree with all of his so called evidence, because i don't.
As his film moves on, his evidence seems to become weaker which leads me to conclude he is trying too hard on too many areas. I wonder why that is ?
I do however, realize that a lot of the information presented to us in the series was inaccurate.
nice one IOH.
 Page:  ««  1  2  3  ...  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®