RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

ENVIRONMENT

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  87  88  89  90  91  ...  96  97  »» 
skipman
Member
#1321 | Posted: 23 Aug 2015 23:59
Reply 
Fracking is contentious,so much so that when a court case concludes the fracking company usually get the plaintives to sign gagging orders. Even the young children.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/05/children-ban-talking-about-frackin g
skipman
Member
#1322 | Posted: 27 Aug 2015 21:47
Reply 
The U.S. government is spending billions of dollars protecting its citizens from terrorists. What is it spending on protecting them from the radiation from Fukashima?

http://enenews.com/breaking-fukushima-nuclear-waste-detected-along-southern-californi a-coast-highest-levels-measured-anywhere-north-america-testing-program-began-84-bqm3- radioactive-cesium-beach-between-los-angele
skipman
Member
#1323 | Posted: 2 Sep 2015 23:34
Reply 
skipman
Member
#1324 | Posted: 6 Sep 2015 13:51
Reply 
Chevron has been polluting the Amazon for years. When they were taken to court and fined,they appealed and lost again.

So a "friendly judge" advised them to use the RICO laws,which are for prosecuting the mob, against the environmentalists.

They have responded by making cartoons about Chevron.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdJ9W39HdDU


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be9XncS8tiA

Chevron believe that the cartoons are causing them more harm, than they did to the people of the Amazon. Ohhh diddums you poor morally decrepid, waste of a human being.
skipman
Member
#1325 | Posted: 7 Sep 2015 21:50
Reply 
A letter from the people of America to those of Europe about the effects of GMO's use on the land, livestock and people.

http://www.theletterfromamerica.org/

Please pass on to friends and your M.P.
skipman
Member
#1326 | Posted: 10 Sep 2015 20:18
Reply 
The New Yok Times has actually printed a story that puts Monsanto and so called independent scientists,who shill for them, in a very bad light.

http://www.naturalnews.com/051098_Monsanto_influence_academic_prostitutes_New_York_Ti mes.html

I wonder what the repercussions will be?
skipman
Member
#1327 | Posted: 13 Sep 2015 23:50
Reply 
skipman
Member
#1328 | Posted: 14 Sep 2015 22:38
Reply 
Things are really turning against GMO's in the U.S.

http://www.naturalnews.com/051156_GMOs_Freedom_of_Information_Act_USDA.html
Kozmik
Member
#1329 | Posted: 16 Sep 2015 19:00
Reply 
skipman:
Things are really turning against GMO's in the U.S.

* In yesterday's DM there was an article saying psychiatric drugs are used wrongly, are addictive and generally fuck you up - suicide being mentioned as a side-effect.
The Big-Pharma drug pushers get doctors to supply their patients with chemicals I wouldn't touch with a barge-pole, and continually rage against the un-patentable 'evil-ha ha' marijuana. If somehow I was allowed to treat people who were 'depressed' or 'stressed-out', I guarantee I would have a much better success rate with my methods than they all have with their's!!
nordsee220
Member
#1330 | Posted: 24 Sep 2015 19:01
Reply 
I'm told (unconfirmed) that the boss of a large motor manufacturing industry has resigned after emissions figures were fiddled. I'm also told he received a 20 million payoff (unconfirmed).

If, in the light of global warming (try not to laugh) it's true that a bloke can fiddle the figures and get 20 million, how much do you think they'll pay me for telling the truth?
skipman
Member
#1331 | Posted: 24 Sep 2015 22:44
Reply 
nordsee220:
how much do you think they'll pay me for telling the truth?

If your asking what you would get, I would say about 10 years, six if you behave your self.
skipman
Member
#1332 | Posted: 1 Oct 2015 22:57
Reply 
Here is a rare thing. The Federal court of America actually doing its job.

http://www.naturalnews.com/051361_pesticides_pollinators_EPA.html
skipman
Member
#1333 | Posted: 1 Oct 2015 23:46
Reply 
They are getting bigger and deeper and they are happening all over the world. What on earth is causing them?

http://www.rt.com/uk/317187-st-albans-sinkhole-evacuation/
skipman
Member
#1334 | Posted: 3 Oct 2015 23:39
Reply 
nordsee220
Member
#1335 | Posted: 4 Oct 2015 11:28 | Edited by: nordsee220
Reply 
Let me first of all say I'm a great believer in re-using, as far as is reasonably practicable, all resources such as glass, plastics, metals etc.
I was also a great believer in global warming some years ago when in fact I submitted to the Environment Agency a complete script for a TV "infomercial". My idea was that a camera, in a house, would eavesdrop on the family activities and show table lights, bedroom lights, tv sets, computers etc ticking over and burning electricity unnecessarily. A voice over would say, "Picture a house, in a street. Perhaps YOUR street. YOUR house. The house has many items burning away, some even on stand-by."

The camera would zoom out of the house to street level then up into the sky, emphasizing the number of houses in a street, a locality, a town, a county then a country wasting electricity.

The final "buzz phrase was, "Are YOU on standy-by for global warming?"

I now believe that whilst we MUST re-use whatever we can, I was duped, WE were duped over what was global warming but they now term man made climate change.

The following is always worth a read (or forward url to friends and associates). Yes there are debunkers but ultimately HOW can taxing people correct something physical? Not that I believe it is physical. I believe the whole man made climate change thing to be nothing other than an humongous con-trick.

http://www.lavoisier.com.au/articles/greenhouse-science/climate-change/climategate-em ails.pdf
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  87  88  89  90  91  ...  96  97  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®