RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

ENVIRONMENT

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  6  7  8  9  10  ...  96  97  »» 
Starseed
Guest
#106 | Posted: 12 Oct 2010 18:32
Reply 
Starseed
Guest
#107 | Posted: 12 Oct 2010 18:35
Reply 
The Money Trail
Feeding starving people takes a backseat in order to fund the climate change fraud

09 OCTOBER 2010



Feeding the hungry or capping CO2 emissions? Not a tough choice if you're an eco-fascist that's anti-people.

Rich nations 'failing to deliver climate cash'

Rich nations are failing to live up to their promise of giving US$30bn to poor countries to help them cope with climate change, according to a report.

The money was pledged at last year's Copenhagen summit in order to build trust between rich and poor nations.
Starseed
Guest
#108 | Posted: 12 Oct 2010 18:37 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
Windpower: Not as Free As You Think


"From now on, the Simpsons are living intermittently."

We've all heard the pitch about how wind is free and that once a windpower facility is constructed, the cost of generation is appropriately set low thanks to no fuel expense. We're also often reminded that no fuel cost means wind will help insulate consumers from wildly fluctuating energy prices.

The concept is easy to grasp, and rural communities considering whether to host a wind facility are likely to conclude that the project will produce local and regional benefits in the form of lower electricity bills.

Think again...
http://climatechangedispatch.com/the-money-trail/7767-windpower-not-as-free-as-you-th ink


In fact it`s all here: http://climatechangedispatch.com/the-money-trail
Starseed
Guest
#109 | Posted: 12 Oct 2010 18:46 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
"As to the costs, should the government actually reach its target of 25GW renewable power, the cost of the hidden subsidy (the Renewable Obligation) will be in the order of £6 billion a year, at today's prices. That will, as Booker correctly noted, add 25 percent to the cost of the average electricity bill – again at today's prices. Also, in getting there, we will have spent £100 billion, the price of 37 nuclear power stations, capable of producing nearly ten times as much electricity."

"The more realistic scenario – again pointed out by Booker – is that there is not the remotest chance of achieving the renewable target. Thus he writes, "what is dangerous is that even contemplating such a mad waste of resources is diverting attention from the genuine need to build enough proper, grown-up power stations to keep our lights on."




http://www.globalwarminghysteria.com/
dreamkatcher
Member
#110 | Posted: 13 Oct 2010 03:59
Reply 
Well, Im convinced. Thanks for the information. Its not my speciality subject, & Im not technically minded - in fact its a joke that I have an up to date mobile phone with my grandsons, but Im open to these matters. Its the "generation" thingy !!

All info greatly appreciated.

dk
Starseed
Guest
#111 | Posted: 13 Oct 2010 06:10
Reply 
dreamkatcher:
Well, Im convinced. Thanks for the information

Cheers DK.

I can`t wait to see this film. (Like most things, I want to see it for free) If I find it I will post a link.


http://www.conwiththewind.com/
dreamkatcher
Member
#112 | Posted: 13 Oct 2010 10:41
Reply 
I know there are about 5 or 6 wind turbines at the mouth of the River Blyth which were said would supply most of Blyth with power, but they are often broken down. It took months for one to get repaired. I believe the results werent half as good as they had expected. Ill watch out for them now. I know there have been lots of demonstrations against some being placed in the Northumberland hills. They'll win in the end though, its a foregone conclusion.

Where my daughter lives on Northumberland hillfarm, its desolate country & coming back over Sweethope Lough single track road, all you see is rough grass, trees, a big antenna & several wind turbines in the distance. Sheep as well of course.

dk
dreamkatcher
Member
#113 | Posted: 13 Oct 2010 11:37
Reply 
Europe: Coldest winter in 1,000 years

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39547649/ns/local_news-cleveland_oh/

If you are planning a trip to Europe this winter, better pack the winter woolies. Several scientists there say this winter could be the coldest Europe has seen in the last 1,000 years.
Why this dire prediction? Polish scientists say the coming cold is connected to the speed of the Gulf Stream. That's the warm current of water that travels from theTropical Atlantic up along the US East Coast and over to Europe. the Gulf Stream effectively brings warmer temperatures to Europe, especially during the cold season. Figure 1 photo shows an active Gulf stream back in 2009. Note the active streams of warmer water (reds and yellow streaks) moving northeast thru theAtlantic Ocean. Figure 2 shows the active warm water streams as of September 1st, 2010. they are substantially weaker!

The Gulf Stream has really slowed down in the past two years. Its now moving at just half the speed it was just a couple of years ago. The scientists believe that this means the stream will not be able to add that extra heat to the European Countryside and compensate for the cold, Arctic winds. These scientists also believe, when the Gulf Stream stops completely, a new Ice Age will begin in Europe...

In Russia, scientists are not as convinced, but are still predicting colder than normal winter temperatures:

"Although the forecast for the next month is only 70 percent accurate, I find the cold winter scenario quite likely," said Russian Meteorologist Vadim Zavodchenkov, "We will be able to judge with more certainty come November. As for last summer's heat, the statistical models that meteorologists use to draw up long-term forecasts aren't able to predict an anomaly like that." Thanks to Russian TImes/RT.
dark star
Member
#114 | Posted: 13 Oct 2010 17:01
Reply 
When the gulf stream stops the seas around UK will freeze......considering a large percentage of imports,including food,arrive by sea it may be time to think ahead.
dreamkatcher
Member
#115 | Posted: 13 Oct 2010 21:45
Reply 
This is how this was received. dk
***************************************************************
Some additional info below the letter

_____

From: Damian
Sent: 12 October 2010 23:34
To: Andrew Johnson
Subject: US physics professor: 'Global warming is the greatest and most
successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life'

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100058265/us-physics-profe
ssor-global-warming-is-the-greatest-and-most-successful-pseudoscientific-fra
ud-i-have-seen-in-my-long-life/

US physics professor: 'Global warming is the greatest and most successful
pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life'

By James <http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/jamesdelingpole/>
Delingpole Politics <http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/category/politics/>
Last updated: October 9th, 2010

2604
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100058265/us-physics-prof
essor-global-warming-is-the-greatest-and-most-successful-pseudoscientific-fr
aud-i-have-seen-in-my-long-life/#disqus_thread> Comments Comment
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100058265/us-physics-prof
essor-global-warming-is-the-greatest-and-most-successful-pseudoscientific-fr
aud-i-have-seen-in-my-long-life/#dPostComment> on this article

Newton: "Fie on you, Hansen, Mann, Jones et al! You
are not worthy of the name scientists! May the pox consume
your shrivelled peterkins!"

Newton: "Fie on you, Hansen, Mann, Jones et al! You are not worthy of the
name scientists! May the pox consume your shrivelled peterkins!"

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of
California, Santa Barbara. Here is his letter of resignation to Curtis G.
Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society..

Anthony
<http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/10/08/hal-lewis-my-resignation-from-the-ame
rican-physical-society/> Watts describes it thus:

This is an important moment in science history. I would describe it as a
letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the
Wittenburg church door <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ninety-Five_Theses>
.. It is worthy of repeating this letter in entirety on every blog that
discusses science.

It's so utterly damning that I'm going to run it in full without further
comment. (H/T GWPF
<http://thegwpf.org/ipcc-news/1670-hal-lewis-my-resignation-from-the-america
n-physical-society.html> , Richard Brearley).

Dear Curt:
When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it
was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a
threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed,
the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of
poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The
prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five
years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious
social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots
aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as
physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an
honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by
the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki
Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was
proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight
committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete
independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be
attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?

How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money
flood has become the raison d'être of much physics research, the vital
sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of
professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride
at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am
forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the
Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of
dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried
APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful
pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone
who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the
ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford's book organizes the
facts very well.) I don't believe that any real physicist, nay scientist,
can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a
definition of the word scientist.

So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge?
It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For
example:

1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction
of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President
immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail
addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important
issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No
more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to
silence debate

2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was
apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly
not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them.
So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the
outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word
incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this
one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never
troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its
entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept
the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position
supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement,
word for word, but approved a far longer "explanatory" screed, admitting
that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket
approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the
APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to
all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not,
and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun
and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our
national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific
society is at stake.

3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the
machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a
fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its
enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not
science; other forces are at work.

4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all,
the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+
signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate
Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best
tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to
the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures,
since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in
every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in
great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.<

5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our
petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a
poll on the members' interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You
did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your
yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of
affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten
more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or
proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter
is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a
vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of
this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our
petition to the Council.

6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to
organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition.

APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious
conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder
that I have lost confidence in the organization?

I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is
always risky to discuss other people's motives. This scheming at APS HQ is
so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held
that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I
don't think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what
Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of
dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips
to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics
Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the
global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of
wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones,
they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise.
As the old saying goes, you don't have to be a weatherman to know which way
the wind is blowing. Since I a
dreamkatcher
Member
#116 | Posted: 13 Oct 2010 21:46
Reply 
Since I am no philosopher, I'm not going to explore at
just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption,
but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this
is not an academic question.

I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer
represents me, but I hope we are still friends.
Hal

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California,
Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of
Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President's Nuclear
Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety
Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of
JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW
II; books: Technological Risk (about, surprise, technological risk) and Why
Flip a Coin (about decision making)

_____

Subject: Michael Coren Interviews Dr. Tim Ball On GW/CC.

Anybody who is interested in the so called Climate Change debate will
profit greatly by listening to the remarks of Dr. Tim Ball, as he is
interviewed by Michael Coren.

Note carefully in Part 4, 4 minutes and 42 seconds into the interview, Dr.
Ball explains that:

" ......the definition of Climate Change is restricted to only those
causes of Climate change that are human........"

And he quotes the fact that the IPCC objective is to "scare" people in
order to capture their attention. Time well spent I can assure you. Total
time is about an hour for the five parts.

Lots of ammunition for people interested in preserving their liberty.

In particular all politicians should watch the videos and take notes. By
doing so they will completely undermine and demolish the Labor/Green
Advocates of GW/CC.

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16bxVS-UtTA>
http://www.youtube..com/watch?v=16bxVS-UtTA

<http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=5Hj_6mVcKtw>
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=5Hj_6mVcKtw

<http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=e77JfDHbAN0>
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=e77JfDHbAN0

<http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=y5C5FmrLl3g>
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=y5C5FmrLl3g

Maurice Strong "I'm going to the UN, where I can get all the $$ I want,
and not be accountable to anyone"

<http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=VUFwp2ReZgQ>
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=VUFwp2ReZgQ

=========================================

http://www.youtube..com/watch?v=1YCatox0Lxo

MDJarv | May 16, 2009
Today, Maurice Strong sits atop the global environmental movement headed
by the United Nations and its interlocking NGO's and tax-exempt
foundations.

Strong is considered to be the person behind the globalization of the
foundation-funded environmental movement, and was the Secretary-General of
the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in 1972, in
Stockholm, Sweden.

He co-authored the 'Earth Charter' with Mikhail Gorbachev in 1992. It was
Gorbachev who stated in 1996 that the "threat of environmental crisis will
be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order."
Strong was recruited by David Rockefeller at the age of 17 and groomed for
the role he serves today. Despite not having a college education, he was a
millionaire by his early 20's and wielded enormous power and influence.

Already in 1972, at the time of this interview, there is talk of doomsday
scenarios if people don't give up their rights and drastically alter the
way they live. Also mentioned in the interview is zero growth, put forward
by the Club of Rome in the late 60's/early 70's, which called for the
control of population and economic growth, and was the precursor to what
we see happening today with the US economy and infrastructure being gutted
and sent overseas.

In this interview clip Strong discusses his proposal of licenses in order
for women to give birth, which has been of much talk among the elite for
the past several decades. In the 70's, David Rockefeller extended his
praise to communist dictator of China, Mao Zedong, in an article published
in the New York Times, for his country's one-child policy, which will be
the model for the Western nations to follow in the future -- hence China's
"Most Favored Nation" status granted by the UN.

For more information on Strong, see my article titled 'Eco-economic
Warfare and the Planned Collapse of Western Civilization':

Ron
Starseed
Guest
#117 | Posted: 14 Oct 2010 16:40 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
DK - I POSTED THE DELINGPOLE STUFF HERE - POST #89


Starseed:
Starseed
Member
#89 | Posted: 10 Oct 2010 09:17 |
Reply Quote
US physics professor: 'Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life'

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Here is his letter of resignation to Curtis G. Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society.

Anthony Watts describes it thus:
This is an important moment in science history. I would describe it as a letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenburg church door. It is worthy of repeating this letter in entirety on every blog that discusses science.

It's so utterly damning that I'm going to run it in full without further comment.

READ IT IN FULL:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100058265/us-physics-professor-glob al-warming-is-the-greatest-and-most-successful-pseudoscientific-fraud-i-have-seen-in- my-long-life/


Direct all 'MSM believers' to this link...

Starseed
Guest
#118 | Posted: 14 Oct 2010 16:44 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
DK - THEN I POSTED THE FOLLOW UP REPORTS HERE


Starseed:
Starseed
Member
#96 | Posted: 12 Oct 2010 16:00 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply Quote
Global warming fraud: the tide begins to turn



'The true hero of the hour is Professor Lewis for having the courage to stick out his neck and say what so many thousands of other scientists around the world would dearly love to say too: that the global warming industry is a scam and sham.
But they can't because, like all of us, they have to make a living. I'll leave it to a commenter called Scotchman to explain how it works:'

"No surprise here. Don't know if any of you are scientists but climate change is a bit of a standing joke in the science community. Want funding for a study of, say, UK swan populations? Sorry old boy, no money. Well, in that case I would like to conduct a study into the effect of climate change on UK swan populations. Certainly, how much would you like? Trouble is it distorts the research. The scientist's objective is to stay in a job, publish papers and run a research team. Process takes precedent over results, a bit like modern policing and medicine really."

And if you wondered how much money is involved, here is Roman Column to explain:

"The professor wrote: "...the money flood has become the raison d'être ..." Let me present some figures below to see why "flood" was not an exaggeration
"The Money Connection

So what is going on here? In time-honored journalistic fashion, follow the money:

- The amount of money spent on anti-AGW activity by organizations is around US$2 million per year, primarily from Heartland.

- The amount of money spent by pro-AGW organisations on research is about US$3 billion per year, about 1,000 times larger. It mainly comes from big government spending on pro-AGW climate research and on promoting the AGW message, and from the Greens.

- Emissions trading by the finance industry was US$120 billion in 2008. This will grow to over US$1 trillion by 2012, and carbon emission permit trading will be the largest "commodity" market in the world—larger than oil, steel, rice, wheat etc. Typically the finance industry might pocket 1% – 5% of the turnover, so even now their financial interest matches the spending on pro-AGW activities and soon it will vastly exceed it.

And here's a physicist Phillip 2, putting Professor Lewis in context:

"I too had a long career as a physicist and I met Prof Hal Lewis at a conference in 1976 (my career was not as long or as eminent as his). I will never forget the talk he gave after dinner one evening. He spoke for an hour without any notes and was truly inspiring; the room was packed and all there were enthralled. A scientist of honour, honesty and integrity. He is one of the last survivors of the great physicists of the second half of the 20th century.
His words of wisdom should be widely disseminated and heeded. "climate scientists" are not scientists in comparison to him."

----------------

I think Realfreedom is right. And the people who ought most especially to take notice are our political class. In Britain, we are stuck with a terrifyingly undemocratic situation in which all three of our main political parties are committed to throwing more and more taxpayers money into the Great Climate Change Lie Machine. When taxpayers finally wise up to what's going on they are going to be very angry indeed. I don't think any of us need kid ourselves any more that "going green" was just an insincere pose David Cameron adopted in order to "detoxify" the Tory brand. Make no mistake, the Eton Grocer is as ideologically committed to the eco-fascist doctrine as Chris Huhne, Ed Miliband or, indeed, his avowed idol Al Gore. [Quote from Dave Cameron, overheard: "I had a meeting the other day with Al Gore: God, he knows his stuff!"]. And perhaps more importantly – as Bloom's film reminds us – it's vital that Dave's father-in-law Sir Reginald Sheffield makes as much money as possible by building lots of wind turbines on his estates.

----------------

It's no coincidence that by far the most popular comment was this one from Cheshirered:

"It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist."

Says it all in one paragragh.

Are you listening, Mr Cameron, Mr Huhne, Mr Clegg, et al?
Or perhaps you 'scrupulously honest' politicians deliberately choose not to listen, eh? In which case you're as bad as the rest of 'em who are in on this outrageous racket.

dreamkatcher
Member
#119 | Posted: 14 Oct 2010 16:56
Reply 
Ooooops. dk dropped a clanger.

Having had no internet for some time, I was trying to get out as much info as I could, so can only grovel on hands & knees, haha.

dk
Starseed
Guest
#120 | Posted: 14 Oct 2010 17:27
Reply 
dreamkatcher:
Ooooops. dk dropped a clanger.

Having had no internet for some time, I was trying to get out as much info as I could, so can only grovel on hands & knees, haha.

dk

No problem, I`m always first with the Delingpole stuff. He is THE BEST!
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  6  7  8  9  10  ...  96  97  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®