RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

ENVIRONMENT

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  60  61  62  63  64  ...  96  97  »» 
skipman
Member
#916 | Posted: 22 May 2013 08:47
Reply 
There are a couple of places in the U.K. where the march against Monsanto is taking place,unfortunately not near me.
If you know anyone who is interested or even does not know anything about Monsanto pass this on to them.

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/05/millions-march-against-monsanto.html
MK_DON
Guest
#917 | Posted: 22 May 2013 11:24 | Edited by: MK_DON
Reply 
Seems the Natural News flip flop is complete here re AGW (as Keiser calls it)
http://www.naturalnews.com/040448_solar_radiation_global_warming_debunked.html
What man made global warming is a hoax... Well......errr..... DUH

Lets look at how this progressed previously.... on Natural News
Tic Toc Tic Toc
www.naturalnews.com/025895_global_warming_climate_change_government.html#ixzz2U0ob5FZ b
We've received a huge number of reader questions (and even complaints) about this issue

Complaints.... about your lies about AGW..... Gosh I wonder why..... could it be because even the dumbest sheep has removed the wool from in-front of it's eyes & can see through the absolute shite posted by Mike Adams re this subject

www.naturalnews.com/021525.html#ixzz2U0p9Ze1G

Their statements about global warming remind me of the Flat Earth Society (people who still insist the Earth is flat), or Holocaust deniers. They just won't acknowledge what's happening right in front of them -- the climate changes, crazy weather patterns, melting ice caps and rising oceans... the current defense of the Republican kooks - is (Global Warming is real but not man made)

It takes a special set of skills to be a Republican these days. You have to close your heart, install blinders on your head and have a special knack for denying reality, even as the evidence against your position is obvious to everyone else.


Wait a minute..............................
It appears Adams was actually talking about himself... the special knack for denying reality even as the evidence.........you know like he did about Peak Oil... and Chavez... & everything else he spouts which is clearly part of the elites agenda being played out through the co-opted faction of the so called truth movement.....

So...... Anyone want to argue that Mike Adams is not part of the Alex Jones/David Icke comedy side show.... I wish these fucks would go back to the agencies that spawned them.... or at the very least the majority of the 2nd herd would wake the fuck up to the fact that they are not awake

Still - I guess there is the possibility that Im wrong and the data Im picking up from the moon matrix has been corrupted en-route
MK_DON
Guest
#918 | Posted: 22 May 2013 11:41
Reply 
Sorry - although I'd normally edit the above to include this... I just found this so funny it warranted a 2nd post

The title of 1st article from NNews above
'Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere'

Mike Adams previous comment
'the evidence linking CO2 emissions to global warming was undeniable by any sane person'

What a waste of flesh and organs - and to think someone could do with a good liver...
Kozmik
Member
#919 | Posted: 22 May 2013 18:56
Reply 
Yes, that mike adams health ranger person can't be trusted. His site, natural news or whatever he calls it is to me, obvious hijacking of TM type issues, part of the bigger picture MK points out where things you think you can trust, it turns out you can't. So, in spite of his site telling certain truths i.e. cancer treatment kills you as sure as the fucking cancer will; it is also used to peddle whatever dis-information is required... What's his stance re:- building 7 or "aeroplane went into pentagon"??
MK_DON
Guest
#920 | Posted: 23 May 2013 11:06 | Edited by: MK_DON
Reply 
MK_DON:
What's his stance re:- building 7

With the greatest respect - I find WTF7 a difficult subject re determining fact from fiction - and as such I do not believe it a good litmus test re whether or not a TS is genuine...

Reason being I do think that certain people over-reach with their hypothesis re WTF7...
I mean one respected TS actually claimed another TS to be a shill because although he pointed to the facts re the TT being turned to dust by an unknown tech - he also stated the facts re the rubble pile at WTF7 and the testimony of proven honest CD experts...

Why anyone could be said to be misdirecting for pointing to the truth re the TT's & then stating FACTS re WTF7 is beyond my comprehension
-
I would go as far as to put this claim on a par with someone claiming that a TS is co-opted cos he wont expose the HG hoax.
Unproven speculation about a subject where the truth is not wholly known... therefore a massive over-reach.
Sure I think it blatantly obvious that the main UK branch of the co-opted faction of the UK TM (i.e. those behind UK Golumn) were brought in to control HG's case from the inside and ensure that HG's story got vastly exagerated in order to discredit it.... but I have heard first hand from a relative of someone involved that there is definately some truth regarding some of the allegations

Getting back to WTF7 - As far as I can see - 95% of the evidence re 7 points to a standard controlled demolition & 5% indicates that it may have been something else...

This 5% (IMO) is
1) the NIST Report (which was set up to create the illusion that it was fire) & the lack of 'sound' detailed in this report

2) The lower than expected seismic reading (which I believe cannot be considered as wholly accurate due to known unknowns - i.e. we must admit that we know we do not know how the effects of residue from the potential DEW affected ground zero in the immediate aftermath of the TT's being turned to dust *full of directed energy *& how this in turn may have affected the seismic reading
*(i.e. think of stamping your foot down or jumping into an empty swimming pool and the vibration given when your foot hits the bottom - then thinking if doing the same when the pool is full of water - now replace water with another substance (i.e. thousands of tons of dust from the TT's which has been affected by directed energy)
Would this second reading when the pool was full of dust full of directed energy be the same as if the pool was empty? - I doubt it but cannot say for certain - so it's a known unknown re whether or not the reading was lower than expected due to what happened to the TT's - therefore I think it an over-reach to claim that the lower than expected reading is proof of a DEW being used on 7))

3) The smoke ('lathering of') 7 - which some people I know who believe that the offical lie is a lie have pointed to as evidence that 7 was not a cd.... they say this smoke was evidence of fire @ 7.... and I believe this was very possibly the aim

*Who has not heard the phrase - where there is smoke there is fire.... so have smoke billow out the building and the offical lie becomes far more believable - esp if coupled with a doctored NIST report which claims there was no sound*


In my mind a far better litmus test re Adams (& co) is their stance re TT's along with whether or not the sites they contribute to are known to be compromised..

In Adams case these are NNews - as discussed - Infearwarts (a hijacked jetliner hit the pentagon)- & The Truthseeker (thermite, thermite, mini nukes & thermite)

Every site listed above promotes the offical conspiracy of thermite being used to bring down the TT's and as such (IMO) should be viewed as.............. well.......
full of shit!
Kozmik
Member
#921 | Posted: 23 May 2013 17:47
Reply 
* I knew Adams was a cunt
Kozmik
Member
#922 | Posted: 23 May 2013 17:50
Reply 
His site is all build yer own shelter & stock up & guns are ok & right wing shit aint so bad....you know what I mean.
skipman
Member
#923 | Posted: 27 May 2013 23:28
Reply 
skipman
Member
#924 | Posted: 28 May 2013 23:47
Reply 
Most of us already know what is happening to our planet with urbanization, deforestation, etc etc. so why are NASA and Google getting together to do a time lapse world show piece?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jHz5kMMavas

I am smelling Agenda 21 all over this.
skipman
Member
#925 | Posted: 29 May 2013 21:50
Reply 
Here is some very good news concerning Monsanto, they been found guilty in a court case,in France.

http://www.realfarmacy.com/monsanto-found-guilty-of-chemical-poisoning-in-landmark-ca se1/

We all know that the U.S. has the best democracy that Monsanto can buy,here is a list of the known contributions that they made to republicans and democrats.

http://naturalsociety.com/list-politicians-paid-off-by-monsanto/


Judging by the non amount of media coverage of the Monsanto World protest day on Saturday. They also have a lot of influence with the MSM.

This deserves more checking out.

http://www.realfarmacy.com/illinois-illegally-seizes-bees-resistant-to-monsantos-roun dup-kills-remaining-queens/?fb_ref=recommendations-box-widget
skipman
Member
#926 | Posted: 29 May 2013 23:10
Reply 
Monsanto is not getting all its own way in Europe. I hope this gets back to the U.S. people and they start putting pressure on Monsanto.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/battle-of-the-bees-eu-high-court-rules-on-gmo-contaminat ion-opens-door-to-biotech-liability/26549
phil_anthropist
Member
#927 | Posted: 30 May 2013 12:22
Reply 
nordsee220
Member
#928 | Posted: 30 May 2013 14:41 | Edited by: nordsee220
Reply 
MK_DON:
'Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere'

It's no longer fashionable to call it global warming as even sheeple question why the summers are so cold and the winters even colder if the planet is warming up.

It's "climate change".

I actually heard a psyentist explaining how 'global warming' was to blame for colder temperatures. He said that the warmer atmosphere was being sent to the north pole by the gulf stream and displacing the colder air there, making it move south.

Now call me a conspiracy theorist but I always thought that hot air doesn't rise at all. It's forced upwards by the denser colder air forcing its way down.

So how does the warmer air manage to displace the colder air "UP"at the poles and HOW does that colder air KNOW that "SOUTH is DOWN" just because that's how we construct our globes?

Is that why, when I go to Scotland I burn more petrol than when I come home to England - because north is UP and south is DOWN? Or did I imagine that bit?

BOLLOX!
Desdichado
Member
#929 | Posted: 30 May 2013 18:30
Reply 
I don't like citing the MSM if I can help it, but our old pals Monsanto are at it again. GMO wheat has been discovered growing in Oregon. GMO wheat has not been approved for farming in the USA (yet) by the USDA but who can tell if Monsanto hasn't already begun sowing their seeds of death, anticipating, and rightly so, the legislature's compliance in bending over backwards for them. These bastards are poisoning us with their Frankenfoods.

URL
skipman
Member
#930 | Posted: 31 May 2013 19:51
Reply 
Desdichado:
GMO wheat has not been approved for farming in the USA

How many other farmers are unwittingly growing this stuff and how long has it been going on for?
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  60  61  62  63  64  ...  96  97  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®