There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.


 Page:  ««  1  2  3  4  5  ...  94  95  96  97  98  »» 
#16 | Posted: 1 Oct 2010 17:57
Who needs wind turbines! We should train the cows in the fields to FART more.

They ARE - or will be soon TAXING cows (ok - us and farms) because they fart. You can look it up yourself. It is just that far out of hand and way, way beyond a joke now. Soon they will be taxing the use of oxygen as that is running out now. (no - really) And still people keep paying, just look at petrol prices?! And the sheep are walking around with heads firmly rammed up their arses! FFS!

At least we all know what IS going on.

That`s all we can do really. Stick together. Share the TRUTH. Learn more TRUTH. And spread the Facts. Good work boys!
#17 | Posted: 1 Oct 2010 18:12 | Edited by: Joe
And the sheep are walking around with heads firmly rammed up their arses! FFS!

At least we all know what IS going on.

That`s all we can do really. Stick together. Share the TRUTH. Learn more TRUTH. And spread the Facts. Good work boys!

The trouble is, there are too many sheeple in the world for a difference to take place!

I don't think (brainless) people like that have the ability to know what's going on - as long as Corrie and EastEnders etc, is on the box; that is all they really care about.
#18 | Posted: 1 Oct 2010 22:35
as long as Corrie and EastEnders etc, is on the box; that is all they really care about.

You get it Joe.

We - get it.

What else can we do? They have every base covered. You can explain it until you are blue in the face. These 'owned' corporate slaves simply refuse to wake up. Lady gaa gaaaa is on got to go....
#19 | Posted: 1 Oct 2010 22:52
The most infuriating responce from sheep is "I'm ok jack". They just think they are because they don't know and just don't want to know any difference.
Anyway look what the Romans did for us.
#20 | Posted: 2 Oct 2010 11:27 | Edited by: Starseed
Al Gore shows up for Kendrick Meek Rally in Tampa. Starts talking about the environment. He had to be confronted again about the Global Warming Hoax.

Every time this bullshitting sack of shit comes out of hiding, someone is there to attack him! He talks out of his arse, his science (non-science) is total shite. He has made vast amounts of money out of this scam. He has been caught out time after time lying. Yet still, fucking pig shit thick Americans turn out to listen to this C**T.

Comments: "If CAP and TRADE passes obama and gore will make billions!!"

Then you look what Ed Militwat stands for...
#21 | Posted: 3 Oct 2010 11:04

I think soon, that if we fail to get the message out to enough people, (that AGW is a fraud and a lie and that 'cutting carbon' will actually have little or NO effect on the planets climate.)

Then, I honestly believe that we will be killed.

I think the constant brainwashing of the cattle, of children, will reach a point where if you dare to question the NON-Science and the lies, some brainwashed tree hugger will kill you. Either that or they will bring in covert or overt laws and regulations that will make it an offence to raise questions about the validity of any of this stuff.

You obey, or you die.

How long before the internet is filtered anyway? Points systems and grading for 'honest' , 'official' sites and blogs. Invisibility for non compliant sites. This one would go straight away.

I believe that they would show this film to children in schools to help in the brainwashing. How long before they do?

You have to fight back now against the Carbon Lies. EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU HEAR THE WORDS 'Climate change' or 'Carbon' utter loudly the words "Fraud - lies - bullshit -"
#22 | Posted: 3 Oct 2010 11:06

Are common purpose behind this?
#23 | Posted: 3 Oct 2010 11:13

( I should have realised this hero would have an article on this)

'Go green or we'll kill your kids' says Richard Curtis eco-propaganda shocker

Gillian Anderson, Peter Crouch [a tall footballer], Radiohead, David Ginola [a French footballer] and – above all – Richard Curtis, I salute you! You have just released a video which has entered history as the most emetic, ugly, counterproductive eco-propaganda movie ever made. Believe me this thing is going to go viral beyond your wildest dreams. But unfortunately that virus is ebola.

What's fascinating, reading this kind of thing, is seeing just how far removed from reality the green movement has gone. Kyoto is dead. Copenhagen was a flop. Cancun is going to make a mockery of all those green dreams about global carbon emissions legislation. And how do the environmentalists respond?

By force of argument?

By presenting new evidence which supports their cause?

By threatening to blow up anyone who disagrees with them.
And not just that: they believe this is actually an entirely reasonable and rather amusing position to adopt.

This isn't, of course, the first time green propagandists have inadvertently revealed the murderous misanthropy which lurks behind their cloak of ecological righteousness.
Greenpeace made this nasty one two years ago: r-kids-says-richard-curtis-eco-propaganda-shocker/

"AFP – Osama bin Laden has expressed concern about global climate change and flooding in Pakistan, in an audiotape aired on the Internet, his first public remarks since March, a monitoring group said Friday.
"The number of victims caused by climate change is very big... bigger than the victims of wars," said the voice, whose authenticity could not be immediately verified and made available by SITE Intelligence Group."

See how bad things are. Remember:
#24 | Posted: 3 Oct 2010 11:17
In the comments -

Green politics are a flag of convenience for the left allowing them to slip their discredited policies in under the banner of saving the planet. Green politics allows them to hide under the skirts of middle class angsty luvvies like Richard Curtis and sneak their misanthropic ideas past a gullible public. But tricky Dicky has cocked up and exposed the hateful underbelly of your movement. I know he did it by accident I know his intentions were well meaning but in his wrong minded attempt at humour he has shone a light on the real thoughts inside a high percentage of Greenies.

These are essentially,

1 Man is Bad

2 Man is killing the Planet

3 Man should be limited

4 Man should be destroyed

5 We are all bad

6 We dont deserve to live

7 Gosh how terrible we are

8 Lets all wear cheesecloth shirts

9 Pass the Chardonnay

10 Can I borrow your bike to get to Oddbins.....

11 Ooh I feel so guilty about living comfortably

12 Must not allow the third world to feel this guilt

13 Must keep them poor because they may be poor but their lives are rich
14 Dont their mud huts look quaint

15 I wonder whats on at the National this weekend.

16 Isnt Obama wonderful. He's black you know

17 Yes haven't they done well

18 Yes we can..... How very jolly

19 Has Franny got any tofu dip?

20 Have you been to that lovely Mongolian

21 Oh yes geat khuushur

22 Fancy going on a demo next weekend

23 Luv to. Palestine or Greenpeace

24 You choose.
#25 | Posted: 3 Oct 2010 11:23 | Edited by: Starseed
Updated with Slides - Lord Christopher Monckton Speaking in St. Paul

The most important talk ever?

If only the world could see this. It SHOULD be played in EVERY school and on everyone's telly right when EastshitEnders is supposed to be on!

We need embedded you tube vids on here


Embedding YouTube Videos
Free add on for minibb:

#26 | Posted: 5 Oct 2010 15:43
Households face £769-a-year rise in power bills to 'rewire the nation' for green energy

A £200billion plan to switch to green energy could cost households an average of £769 a year, it was claimed today.
Industry regulator, Ofgem, said a massive construction plan is needed to build new wind farms,

Read more: on-green-energy.html#ixzz11UlWdn9A

"The full £200billion cost would put up the average annual bill of £1,194 by £769 a year - or 68 per cent - to £2,000."

Good Plans eh? Should kill off a few thousand old people every winter.

Pass the word around NOW before it`s too late!!

#27 | Posted: 5 Oct 2010 15:56
Do you think Global Warming will destroy the planet? Lets take a closer look at the facts.

TEN MYTHS of Global Warming

"the climate has always changed and always will! The sea levels have always changed and ice sheets come and go as does life. The Anthropological Global Warming movement is a fraud and a money making exercise with huge social ramifacations."

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken (1918) Nothing Has Changed!
#28 | Posted: 5 Oct 2010 16:00
#29 | Posted: 5 Oct 2010 16:07
There is most certainly a pattern to climate change...
...but it's not what you may think:

For at least 114 years, climate "scientists" have been claiming that the climate was going to kill us...but they have kept switching whether it was a coming ice age, or global warming.

1895 - Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again – New York Times, February 1895
1902 - "Disappearing Glaciers...deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation...scientific fact...surely disappearing." – Los Angeles Times
1912 - Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age – New York Times, October 1912
1923 - "Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada" – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – Chicago Tribune
1923 - "The discoveries of changes in the sun's heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age" – Washington Post
1924 - MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age – New York Times, Sept 18, 1924
1929 - "Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer" – Los Angeles Times, in Is another ice age coming?
1932 - "If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age" – The Atlantic magazine, This Cold, Cold World
1933 - America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise – New York Times, March 27th, 1933
1933 – "...wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather...Is our climate changing?" – Federal Weather Bureau "Monthly Weather Review."
1938 - Global warming, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, "is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power."– Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
1938 - "Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise...Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades" – Chicago Tribune
1939 - "Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right... weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer" – Washington Post
1952 - "...we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century" – New York Times, August 10th, 1962
1954 - "...winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing" – U.S. News and World Report
1954 - Climate – the Heat May Be Off – Fortune Magazine
1959 - "Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures" – New York Times
1969 - "...the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two" – New York Times, February 20th, 1969
1969 – "If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000″ — Paul Ehrlich (while he now predicts doom from global warming, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation)
1970 - "...get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters – the worst may be yet to come...there's no relief in sight" – Washington Post
1974 - Global cooling for the past forty years – Time Magazine
1974 - "Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age" – Washington Post
1974 - "As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed" – Fortune magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger
1974 - "...the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure...mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence" – New York Times
Cassandras are becomingincreasingly apprehensive,for the weatheraberrations they arestudying may be theharbinger of anotherice age
1975 - Scientists Ponder Why World's Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable – New York Times, May 21st, 1975
1975 - "The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind" Nigel Calder, editor, New Scientist magazine, in an article in International Wildlife Magazine
1976 - "Even U.S. farms may be hit by cooling trend" – U.S. News and World Report
1981 - Global Warming – "of an almost unprecedented magnitude" – New York Times
1988 - I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that thegreenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves. – Jim Hansen, June 1988 testimony before Congress, see His later quote and His superior's objection for context
1989 -"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we'd like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This "double ethical bind" we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both." – Stephen Schneider, lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Discover magazine, October 1989
1990 - "We've got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing – in terms of economic policy and environmental policy" – Senator Timothy Wirth
1993 - "Global climate change may alter temperature and rainfall patterns, many scientists fear, with uncertain consequences for agriculture." – U.S. News and World Report
1998 - No matter if the science [of global warming] is all phony . . . climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world." —Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment, Calgary Herald, 1998
2001 - "Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible." – Time Magazine, Monday, Apr. 09, 2001
2003 - Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as "synfuels," shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration" – Jim Hansen, NASA Global Warming activist, Can we defuse The Global Warming Time Bomb?, 2003
2006 - "I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis." — Al Gore, Grist magazine, May 2006
Now: The global mean temperature has fallen for four years in a row, which is why you stopped hearing details about the actual global temperature, even while they carry on about taxing you to deal with long before they start predicting an ice age?

#30 | Posted: 5 Oct 2010 16:10 | Edited by: Starseed
Worse still, notice that in 1933 they claim global warming has been going on for 25 years...the entire 25 years they were saying we were entering an ice age. And in 1974, they say there has been global cooling for 40 years...the entire time of which they'd been claiming the earth was getting hotter! Of course NOW they are talking about the earth "warming for the past century", again ignoring that they spent much of that century claiming we were entering an ice age.

The fact is that the mean temperature of the planet is, and should be, always wavering up or down, a bit, because this is a natural world, not a climate-controlled office. So there will always be some silly bureaucrat, in his air-conditioned ivory tower, who looks at which way it's going right now, draws up a chart as if this is permanant, realizes how much fear can increase his funding, and proclaims doom for all of humanity.

2006 – "It is not a debate over whether the earth has been warming over the past century. The earth is always warming or cooling, at least a few tenths of a degree..." — Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology at MIT
2006 – "What we have fundamentally forgotten is simple primary school science. Climate always changes. It is always...warming or cooling, it's never stable. And if it were stable, it would actually be interesting scientifically because it would be the first time for four and a half billion years." —Philip Stott, emeritus professor of bio-geography at the University of London
2006 - "Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming scares during four separate and sometimes overlapping time periods. From 1895 until the 1930′s the media peddled a coming ice age. From the late 1920′s until the 1960′s they warned of global warming. From the 1950′s until the 1970′s they warned us again of a coming ice age. This makes modern global warming the fourth estate's fourth attempt to promote opposing climate change fears during the last 100 years." – Senator James Inhofe, Monday, September 25, 2006
2007- "I gave a talk recently (on fallacies of global warming) and three members of the Canadian government, the environmental cabinet, came up afterwards and said, 'We agree with you, but it's not worth our jobs to say anything.' So what's being created is a huge industry with billions of dollars of government money and people's jobs dependent on it." – Dr. Tim Ball, Coast-to-Coast, Feb 6, 2007
2008 – "Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA's official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind's effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress" – Dr. John S. Theon, retired Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA, see above for Hansen quotes

Next time you see the usual "global warming" chart, look carefully: it is in tiny fractions of one degree. The ENTIRE global warming is less than six tenths of one degree. Here is the Global Warming Advocates' own chart, rendered in actual degrees like sane people use. I was going to use 0-100 like a thermometer, but you end up with almost a flat line, so I HELPED the Climate Change side by making the temperature range much narrower, and the chart needlessly tall to stretch the up-down differences in the line.

If YOUR government (and their masters) Tax you to death (quite literally in some cases), to force you to 'cut your carbon emissions (FFS)

IT IS THE SUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 Page:  ««  1  2  3  4  5  ...  94  95  96  97  98  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.

Forums are powered by miniBB®