RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

THE MOON & SOLAR SYSTEM

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  72  73  74  75  76  ...  99  100  »» 
AllSpark
Member
#1096 | Posted: 13 Jun 2012 20:26 | Edited by: AllSpark
Reply 
I posted a Richard Hoagland interview somewhere earlier. In it he mentioned about an experiment he was conducting on the 20th May of this year. The interview was made, i think about a week before the 20th. He was talking about Torsion Fields and how an eclipse effects the mass of objects around the time of dawn.
I wondered about this, so i went looking to see what hapened on and around that date ( hindsight being the wonderful thing that it is ).
Firstly, i checked to see what Keith Hunter ( of starship interview ) had to say on the matter.
In Chapter 18 of his book 'The Lost Age of High Knowledge', Keith Hunter explains......
"And thus with high confidence one may conclude that the celestial relations of the heavenly bodies most important to the earth - the Sun and Moon at the very least - in their dynamic configurations, are directly responsible in a true causative sense for producing highly targeted seismic disturbances upon the surface of the planet (or just beneath) in the form of earthquakes."
hmmmm........ ok

This next url ( if it works ) is the predicted path
URL
next is a short youtube clip of the exlipse
URL

and here is what happened after... from dutchsinse
URL

and here is what wikipedia says about earthquakes
URL
not a single mention of celestial bodies.

Alternative Scientists 2 - 0 mainstream Science
skipman
Member
#1097 | Posted: 14 Jun 2012 00:28
Reply 
There was also a clip about the eclipse effecting the motion of a particular kind of pendulum(I cannot recall its name,the ......effect) Do you know if the effect was repeated?
AllSpark
Member
#1098 | Posted: 14 Jun 2012 11:02 | Edited by: AllSpark
Reply 
skipman:
There was also a clip about the eclipse effecting the motion of a particular kind of pendulum(I cannot recall its name,the ......effect) Do you know if the effect was repeated?

Thats the one i was looking for. He was going atop a pyramid to do the experiment with the tuning fork on the 20th May, but I have not found anything about it. Maybe he is putting it all together for a presentation or a book.
I found another interesting view of planets affects on the earth URL
AllSpark
Member
#1099 | Posted: 14 Jun 2012 11:40
Reply 
I googled this..... richard hoagland experiment 20th may 2012
and the whole page filled with debunkers !
Blogs called 'dorkmission', others titled 'PseudoAstronomy'
It really is amazing that they are queing up to destroy his theory..... without him even presenting any kind of evidence thus far!

they do however, have a point about the 'baseline'. He must pay attention to the way he conducts experiments. Perhaps he should take a leaf out of the Rupert Sheldrake book of ' making sure the bastards can't trip you up'
Kozmik
Member
#1100 | Posted: 14 Jun 2012 16:43
Reply 
It's always the same when alternative meets mainstream. Scientists have to operate "Respectably" and so it can be difficult to get them to even look at data that doesn't fit in with "where they're at". Skeptics & Debunkers always use science to rubbish the paranormal.
mmotorway
Member
#1101 | Posted: 17 Jun 2012 13:53
Reply 
Thanks for the "heads up" on Moon Rising. Excellent video!
AllSpark
Member
#1102 | Posted: 22 Jun 2012 15:49 | Edited by: AllSpark
Reply 
NASA live feed to the spacestation.
Just found this by accident......full sceen is cool. It's not always a blank pic. They are milling about.
URL
might be worth checking back here if a solar flare was heading their way.
I opened up a seperate tab and played this in the background...
URL
SPIRAL
Member
#1103 | Posted: 27 Jun 2012 18:06
Reply 
"This is what I call an EPIC backfire. A member of ATS allegedly got an email from Anthony Colaprete of NASA Ames Research Center, concerning THAT image photographed on his desk, while him and his colleague conducted analysis in the data of LRO/LCROSS mission.
In the alleged email, Colaprete says that the object seen in the Cabeus crater is just a "digital marking grid" and the picture is not real, but a computer simulation. I don't know whether that email was faked, or if Colaprete was caught sooo surprised by this controversy, but the two annex pictures used by demonstrate the alleged "grid", are a MAJOR backfire in the shills and trolls who argue against those who believe that what's in the desk photo is
actually an artificial structure in the crater."


URL
AllSpark
Member
#1104 | Posted: 27 Jun 2012 21:39
Reply 
SPIRAL:
"This is what I call an EPIC backfire. A member of ATS allegedly got an email from Anthony Colaprete of NASA Ames Research Center, concerning THAT image photographed on his desk, while him and his colleague conducted analysis in the data of LRO/LCROSS mission.
In the alleged email, Colaprete says that the object seen in the Cabeus crater is just a "digital marking grid" and the picture is not real, but a computer simulation. I don't know whether that email was faked, or if Colaprete was caught sooo surprised by this controversy, but the two annex pictures used by demonstrate the alleged "grid", are a MAJOR backfire in the shills and trolls who argue against those who believe that what's in the desk photo is
actually an artificial structure in the crater."

URL

Yet another piece of evidence that can't be explained away with a bullshit story.
skipman
Member
#1105 | Posted: 27 Jun 2012 21:49
Reply 
SPIRAL:
This is what I call an EPIC backfire

Keep them coming SPIRAL
skipman
Member
#1106 | Posted: 29 Jul 2012 11:34
Reply 
Her is a link to the New Scientist that trys to explain the warming on Mars and Pluto.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11642-climate-myths-mars-and-pluto-are-warming- too.html
AllSpark
Member
#1107 | Posted: 29 Jul 2012 14:23 | Edited by: AllSpark
Reply 
Interesting article skip.
I don't think they are too confident about what they think is really going on.
Mainstream still does'nt have all the answers, particularly when they say things like this....

"One theory is that winds have recently swept some areas of Mars clean of dust, darkening the surface, warming the Red Planet and leading to further increases in windiness "
Hmmm really ?
The planet still has dust ? and it's red is it ?
Not according to this.....
URL
quark1
Member
#1108 | Posted: 29 Jul 2012 20:00
Reply 
OK - I admit I am a competition addict amongst my many vices - and no I'll not be posting details of those my friends!

There is a great competition I've found which could give the winner access to US astronaut Charles Duke and a Florida holiday - those interested can take a stab at winning by following the link below. You have to construct a question you'd like to ask him - mine and my son's of course follow the course of possible unusual observations!

10 signed copies of his book are also up for grabs

Good Luck everyone

http://www.attraction-tickets-direct.co.uk/space

Posting copy on Moon thread as well

As promised
skipman
Member
#1109 | Posted: 30 Jul 2012 00:08
Reply 
AllSpark:
Hmmm really ?
The planet still has dust ? and it's red is it ?
Not according to this.....
URL

There is definately something hokey going on. Thanks for the link AllSpark
AllSpark
Member
#1110 | Posted: 30 Jul 2012 00:36
Reply 
skipman:
There is definately something hokey going on.

I agree, it's just that those who really know, are not going to tell us. We have to wait until someone breaks ranks and lets us know about it ( and that don't happen as often as it should either).
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  72  73  74  75  76  ...  99  100  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®