RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  6  7  8  9  10  ...  41  42  »» 
monkeyboy
Member
#106 | Posted: 7 Jan 2010 21:26
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
I have put quite a lot of stuff on the richlanet youtube channel (richplanetuk). All programmes are viewable from this website once they've been on TV. The problem with youtube is you need to split the shows into 10 minute chunks, which is a pain.

Crop Circles The Hidden Truth has had over 9,000 online views which is more than watched it on EMTV.

sorry richard i didn`t realise you had one. i haven`t heard you or anyone else mention it?

http://www.youtube.com/user/richplanetuk

subscibed cheers and i know what you mean about the 10 min chunks pain in the arse even if you are watching somthing and have to find the next because they haven`t created a play list.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#107 | Posted: 7 Jan 2010 21:35
Reply 
The whole airport security measures are proposterous and here's why.

I can get on a train from Newcastle to London with a suitcase the size of a wardrobe full of dynamite. I would be assisted onto the train by helpful members of the public. There's even a special place for the luggage at the end of each carriage. I get off at York. The train goes through a tunnel just past Stevenage. When the entire train is in the tunnel I trigger the wardrobe remotely. The train is packed and most people die.

Question: why no security at train stations.

Or for that matter, football grounds, bus depots, pop concerts nightclubs etc etc etc.

It's a f*****g farce the whole thing, designed to induce fear so that the terroist myth can be propogated, which means they can invade/control the countries that these "terrorists" are alleged to come from.

Why can't ordinary people see through it!
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#108 | Posted: 9 Jan 2010 10:56 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
I am just thinking aloud here and these events may or may not be related. Here's the sequence.

20th NOV 2009 Emails revealed to public of scientists falsifying climate data
- Mainstram media try to play it down
- BBC puts on global warming documentaries (unshceduled) propaganda
6th DEC 2009 Copenhagan climate conference starts
9th DEC 2009 Strange spiral seen above Norway
17th DEC 2009 Britain & northern hemisphere plunged into worst snow / cold for decades

Is it possible that the emails were spoken about at Copenhagen and the mood of certain countries was total outrage. (Although not reported by the conference).

Having realised the "mood" and also knowing that these emails are never going to go away, the global elite made a decision to stop fuelling the global warming scam because they know they cannot now get away with it. The best way to end it and divert attention would be to convince people using "an event" and subsequently the media that we got it wrong on global warming. How do you do this ... plunge the Norhtern hemisphere into cold weather using one of your undisclosed energy weapons creating the spiral and a hole in one of the Earths protective layers. You then leave the mainstream media to do the rest.

Perhaps the global elite realised that people might find them out and so decided to cut and run. Rather than be slowly uncovered by a drip drip of evidence against them, they chose to turn the ship around quickly by using this "weather event". The only way to change the public perception on global warming, would be to create in front of their eyes global freezing. They're a gullable lot, they'll believe that one.

This created the weather we are now having and started the beginning of the end of the global warming scam. They can now think of other ways of creating a one world government which is what global warming was being used to try and do. I am not saying this theory is correct. I am just looking at the string of events and wondering if they are related.

Let's see after we get through this winter if the accepted view on global warming is still here, or whether the mainstream media sees to it that the masses are brainwashed into believing a completely opposing view.

I am not saying here whether global warming is or isn't real. I don't know. I am saying that in the early 90's when information on a possible global warming problem started reaching the media. Certain powerful elites picked up on the issue and started using it for their own nefarious purposes and have now been found out by these emails.
Starseed
Guest
#109 | Posted: 9 Jan 2010 14:27
Reply 
I dont think they are going to give up that easily. Or are they?

This is a superb theory I think, especially when you read the replies to online newspaper stories from the 'bedwetters'.

Each and every pro AGW supporting story is followed (where allowed) by a never ending stream (I would say 10-1) of sceptic rebuttal. It has been like this for a long time and is growing.

It gives great hope to me and others I know who used to think that the masses were all asleep. THEY ARE, but more and more every day refuse to believe the lies anymore, and that is uplifting.
Starseed
Guest
#110 | Posted: 9 Jan 2010 14:30
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
Question: why no security at train stations.

Or for that matter, football grounds, bus depots, pop concerts nightclubs etc etc etc.

Ah ha! They are going to - that`s the plan...

'Now Mobile Devices Will Scan Your Naked Body On The Streets'

"Naked body scanners are being readied to go mobile and scan you on the street, at football games and any other event where masses of people are congregated, according to a leaked paper written by Dutch authorities.

As we have been warning all along, the tyranny now being metered out at airports was always intended to be rolled out onto the streets, with mobile metal detectors already being stationed at various transport hubs in the UK in the name of stopping knife crime.

Now Dutch police have announced that they are developing a mobile scanner that will "see through people's clothing and look for concealed weapons".

According to a confidential document, "The scanner could first be used as an alternative to random body searches in high risk areas. The mobile detector would enable the search to be carried out more quickly and would only be used on people suspected of carrying concealed weapons," reports Dutch News.nl.

The device would also be used from a distance on groups of people "and mass scans on crowds at events such as football matches."

From this article:
http://www.infowars.com/now-mobile-devices-will-scan-your-naked-body-on-the-streets/
dreamkatcher
Member
#111 | Posted: 9 Jan 2010 14:35
Reply 
There's always a "false flag" to divert attention from whats going on, so we "sheeple" change course. What happened to the swine flu pandemic, which today was reported on BBC was even less than a normal flu season? What happens to the people conned into having the vaccine? There's no compensation, they made sure of that ! What about the "russian plague?" It was supposed to go to Poland as well & kill thousands. Why no more news about that?

Why do they stand down the troops just before a situation occurs, 9/11. 7/7, etc.

Just my thoughts on this.

DK
dreamkatcher
Member
#112 | Posted: 9 Jan 2010 14:42
Reply 
This is an old article, but very useful to know. Where is Meacher now?

THIS WAR ON TERRORISM IS BOGUS

By Michael Meacher


World-Action

World-Action ceased covering world events in 2004 because the world situation was by then fairly clear. A group of powerful people appear to be making fatal decisions for the whole world. The danger is that we keep 'following the news' and never get into action to change the news! Spread information on a few key subjects to everyone you know - and change the world. The truth about the '9-11' attack and the fake 'War On Terror'. The global spraying of bioweapons called 'Chemtrails'. These powerful people are keeping the facts of the ET / UFO cover-up from the world. Spread the word. Wake the world. Be Strategic. Start now.


'THIS WAR ON TERRORISM IS BOGUS'

By Michael Meacher

Michael Meacher MP was Environment Minister from 1997 to 2003

GUARDIAN UNLIMITED http://www.guardian.co.uk

Saturday September 6, 2003 - The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/sep/06/september11.iraq



Michael Meacher in 2008: "Our Time Is Coming"



This war on terrorism is bogus. The 9/11 attacks gave the U.S.
an ideal pretext to use force to secure its global domination.



Massive attention has now been given - and rightly so - to the reasons why Britain went to war against Iraq. But far too little attention has focused on why the US went to war, and that throws light on British motives too. The conventional explanation is that after the Twin Towers were hit, retaliation against al-Qaida bases in Afghanistan was a natural first step in launching a global war against terrorism. Then, because Saddam Hussein was alleged by the US and UK governments to retain weapons of mass destruction, the war could be extended to Iraq as well. However this theory does not fit all the facts. The truth may be a great deal murkier.



We now know that a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), Jeb Bush (George Bush's younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences, was written in September 2000 by the neoconservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC).



The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says "while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."



The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier document attributed to Wolfowitz and Libby which said the US must "discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role". It refers to key allies such as the UK as "the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership". It describes peacekeeping missions as "demanding American political leadership rather than that of the UN". It says "even should Saddam pass from the scene", US bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently... as "Iran may well prove as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has". It spotlights China for "regime change", saying "it is time to increase the presence of American forces in SE Asia".



The document also calls for the creation of "US space forces" to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent "enemies" using the internet against the US. It also hints that the US may consider developing biological weapons "that can target specific genotypes [and] may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool".



Finally - written a year before 9/11 - it pinpoints North Korea, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes, and says their existence justifies the creation of a "worldwide command and control system". This is a blueprint for US world domination. But before it is dismissed as an agenda for rightwing fantasists, it is clear it provides a much better explanation of what actually happened before, during and after 9/11 than the global war on terrorism thesis. This can be seen in several ways.



First, it is clear the US authorities did little or nothing to pre-empt the events of 9/11. It is known that at least 11 countries provided advance warning to the US of the 9/11 attacks. Two senior Mossad experts were sent to Washington in August 2001 to alert the CIA and FBI to a cell of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation (Daily Telegraph, September 16 2001). The list they provided included the names of four of the 9/11 hijackers, none of whom was arrested.



It had been known as early as 1996 that there were plans to hit Washington targets with aeroplanes. Then in 1999 a US national intelligence council report noted that "al-Qaida suicide bombers could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the CIA, or the White House".



Fifteen of the 9/11 hijackers obtained their visas in Saudi Arabia. Michael Springman, the former head of the American visa bureau in Jeddah, has stated that since 1987 the CIA had been illicitly issuing visas to unqualified applicants from the Middle East and bringing them to the US for training in terrorism for the Afghan war in collaboration with Bin Laden (BBC, November 6 2001). It seems this operation continued after the Afghan war for other purposes. It is also reported that five of the hijackers received training at secure US military installations in the 1990s (Newsweek, September 15 2001).



Instructive leads prior to 9/11 were not followed up. French Moroccan flight student Zacarias Moussaoui (now thought to be the 20th hijacker) was arrested in August 2001 after an instructor reported he showed a suspicious interest in learning how to steer large airliners. When US agents learned from French intelligence he had radical Islamist ties, they sought a warrant to search his computer, which contained clues to the September 11 mission (Times, November 3 2001). But they were turned down by the FBI. One agent wrote, a month before 9/11, that Moussaoui might be planning to crash into the Twin Towers (Newsweek, May 20 2002).



All of this makes it all the more astonishing - on the war on terrorism perspective - that there was such slow reaction on September 11 itself. The first hijacking was suspected at not later than 8.20am, and the last hijacked aircraft crashed in Pennsylvania at 10.06am. Not a single fighter plane was scrambled to investigate from the US Andrews airforce base, just 10 miles from Washington DC, until after the third plane had hit the Pentagon at 9.38 am. Why not? There were standard FAA intercept procedures for hijacked aircraft before 9/11. Between September 2000 and June 2001 the US military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to chase suspicious aircraft (AP, August 13 2002). It is a US legal requirement that once an aircraft has moved significantly off its flight plan, fighter planes are sent up to investigate.





WTC Twin Towers





Was this inaction simply the result of key people disregarding, or being ignorant of, the evidence? Or could US air security operations have been deliberately stood down on September 11? If so, why, and on whose authority? The former US federal crimes prosecutor, John Loftus, has said: "The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defence of incompetence."



Nor is the US response after 9/11 any better. No serious attempt has ever been made to catch Bin Laden. In late September and early October 2001, leaders of Pakistan's two Islamist parties negotiated Bin Laden's extradition to Pakistan to stand trial for 9/11. However, a US official said, significantly, that "casting our objectives too narrowly" risked "a premature collapse of the international effort if by some lucky chance Mr Bin Laden was captured". The US chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General Myers, went so far as to say that "the goal has never been to get Bin Laden" (AP, April 5 2002). The whistleblowing FBI agent Robert Wright told ABC News (December 19 2002) that FBI headquarters wanted no arrests. And in November 2001 the US airforce complained it had had al-Qaida and Taliban leaders in its sights as many as 10 times over the previous six weeks, but had been unable to attack because they did not receive permission quickly enough (Time Magazine, May 13 2002). None of this assembled evidence, all of which comes from sources already in the public domain, is compatible with the idea of a real, determined war on terrorism.



The catalogue of evidence does, however, fall into place when set against the PNAC blueprint. From this it seems that the so-called "war on terrorism" is being used largely as bogus cover for achieving wider US strategic geopolitical objectives. Indeed Tony Blair himself hinted at this when he said to the Commons liaison committee: "To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11" (Times, July 17 2002). Similarly Rumsfeld was so determined to obtain a rationale for an attack on Iraq that on 10 separate occasions he asked the CIA to find evidence linking Iraq to 9/11; the CIA repeatedly came back empty-handed (Time Magazine, May 13 2002).



In fact, 9/11 offered an extremely convenient pretext to put the PNAC plan into action. The evidence again is quite clear that plans for military action against Afghanistan and Iraq were in hand well before 9/11. A report prepared for the US government from the Baker Institute of Public Policy stated in April 2001 that "the US r
dreamkatcher
Member
#113 | Posted: 9 Jan 2010 14:44
Reply 
remains a prisoner of its energy dilemma. Iraq remains a destabilising influence to... the flow of oil to international markets from the Middle East". Submitted to Vice-President Cheney's energy task group, the report recommended that because this was an unacceptable risk to the US, "military intervention" was necessary (Sunday Herald, October 6 2002).



Similar evidence exists in regard to Afghanistan. The BBC reported (September 18 2001) that Niaz Niak, a former Pakistan foreign secretary, was told by senior American officials at a meeting in Berlin in mid-July 2001 that "military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October". Until July 2001 the US government saw the Taliban regime as a source of stability in Central Asia that would enable the construction of hydrocarbon pipelines from the oil and gas fields in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Indian Ocean. But, confronted with the Taliban's refusal to accept US conditions, the US representatives told them "either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs" (Inter Press Service, November 15 2001).



Given this background, it is not surprising that some have seen the US failure to avert the 9/11 attacks as creating an invaluable pretext for attacking Afghanistan in a war that had clearly already been well planned in advance. There is a possible precedent for this. The US national archives reveal that President Roosevelt used exactly this approach in relation to Pearl Harbor on December 7 1941. Some advance warning of the attacks was received, but the information never reached the US fleet. The ensuing national outrage persuaded a reluctant US public to join the second world war. Similarly the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the US into "tomorrow's dominant force" is likely to be a long one in the absence of "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor". The 9/11 attacks allowed the US to press the "go" button for a strategy in accordance with the PNAC agenda which it would otherwise have been politically impossible to implement.



The overriding motivation for this political smokescreen is that the US and the UK are beginning to run out of secure hydrocarbon energy supplies. By 2010 the Muslim world will control as much as 60% of the world's oil production and, even more importantly, 95% of remaining global oil export capacity. As demand is increasing, so supply is decreasing, continually since the 1960s.



This is leading to increasing dependence on foreign oil supplies for both the US and the UK. The US, which in 1990 produced domestically 57% of its total energy demand, is predicted to produce only 39% of its needs by 2010. A DTI minister has admitted that the UK could be facing "severe" gas shortages by 2005. The UK government has confirmed that 70% of our electricity will come from gas by 2020, and 90% of that will be imported. In that context it should be noted that Iraq has 110 trillion cubic feet of gas reserves in addition to its oil.



A report from the commission on America's national interests in July 2000 noted that the most promising new source of world supplies was the Caspian region, and this would relieve US dependence on Saudi Arabia. To diversify supply routes from the Caspian, one pipeline would run westward via Azerbaijan and Georgia to the Turkish port of Ceyhan. Another would extend eastwards through Afghanistan and Pakistan and terminate near the Indian border. This would rescue Enron's beleaguered power plant at Dabhol on India's west coast, in which Enron had sunk $3bn investment and whose economic survival was dependent on access to cheap gas.



Nor has the UK been disinterested in this scramble for the remaining world supplies of hydrocarbons, and this may partly explain British participation in US military actions. Lord Browne, chief executive of BP, warned Washington not to carve up Iraq for its own oil companies in the aftermath of war (Guardian, October 30 2002). And when a British foreign minister met Gadaffi in his desert tent in August 2002, it was said that "the UK does not want to lose out to other European nations already jostling for advantage when it comes to potentially lucrative oil contracts" with Libya (BBC Online, August 10 2002).



The conclusion of all this analysis must surely be that the "global war on terrorism" has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda - the US goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project. Is collusion in this myth and junior participation in this project really a proper aspiration for British foreign policy? If there was ever need to justify a more objective British stance, driven by our own independent goals, this whole depressing saga surely provides all the evidence needed for a radical change of course.


Michael Meacher MP was environment

minister from May 1997 to June 2003



THE ABOVE ARTICLE IS AT:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/sep/06/september11.iraq



Michael Meacher in 2008: "Our Time Is Coming"



THE 9-11 DECEPTION



Top of Page
The Big World Gathering

"We must do what we conceive to be the right thing and not bother our heads or burden our souls with whether we will be successful. Because if we don't do the right thing, we will be doing the wrong thing and we will just be a part of the disease and not part of the cure." ~ E. F. Schumacher
Starseed
Guest
#114 | Posted: 10 Jan 2010 11:16
Reply 
There are a handfull of people left who believe the 'official' 9/11 report.

You mean to tell me you don`t ??!!

I think they answered everyones questions fully and provided all the answers needed to reassure the public...

Nothing to see here - move along.
Starseed
Guest
#115 | Posted: 10 Jan 2010 11:17
Reply 
Oh, and Oswald acted alone too.
infiniteawareness
Member
#116 | Posted: 11 Jan 2010 20:11
Reply 
"I am just thinking aloud here and these events may or may not be related. Here's the sequence.

20th NOV 2009 Emails revealed to public of scientists falsifying climate data
- Mainstram media try to play it down
- BBC puts on global warming documentaries (unshceduled) propaganda
6th DEC 2009 Copenhagan climate conference starts
9th DEC 2009 Strange spiral seen above Norway
17th DEC 2009 Britain & northern hemisphere plunged into worst snow / cold for "

Hi Richard
Could the Copenhagen Conference have been an unofficial Bilderberg meeting? Since then there has been a spate of so-called terrorist attacks and news leaks related to Pakistan, Iran and China. Including the following:
dec 25 Detroit
dec 27 Muzaffarabad
dec 28 Karachi
Then the attack on The Togo football team which might have been a genuine terrorist attack. Plus other smaller, related incidents. They are definitley upping the ante.
IA
infiniteawareness
Member
#117 | Posted: 13 Jan 2010 12:10
Reply 
infiniteawareness:
"I am just thinking aloud here and these events may or may not be related. Here's the sequence.

20th NOV 2009 Emails revealed to public of scientists falsifying climate data
- Mainstram media try to play it down
- BBC puts on global warming documentaries (unshceduled) propaganda
6th DEC 2009 Copenhagan climate conference starts
9th DEC 2009 Strange spiral seen above Norway
17th DEC 2009 Britain & northern hemisphere plunged into worst snow / cold for "

Hi Richard
Could the Copenhagen Conference have been an unofficial Bilderberg meeting? Since then there has been a spate of so-called terrorist attacks and news leaks related to Pakistan, Iran and China. Including the following:
dec 25 Detroit
dec 27 Muzaffarabad
dec 28 Karachi
Then the attack on The Togo football team which might have been a genuine terrorist attack. Plus other smaller, related incidents. They are definitley upping the ante.
IA


Hi Richard and fellow forumers
Richard i was hoping that you or any of the other regulars could give their opinions on the incidents i mentioned above. The forum went dead during xmas and the new year celebrations and while you were all enjoying xmas which is your Wont, those incidents were happening and are significant. I am sure like me you avoid the mainstream media news propaganda machine like the plague but i am sure you still know what is going on.
Kind Regards
IA
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#118 | Posted: 13 Jan 2010 21:59 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
It's so hard to know what to believe these days. Once the penny drops and you realise whats happened to mainstream news you get scraps of evidence from various sources.

What I would like to see is a totally independant monthly newspaper, with real investigative journalism. Maybe cover 2 or 3 stories in depth each month - from UK and worldwide. A team of journaists working solid for 3 weeks or so on each story getting to the bottom of it.

This month we investigate:
CIA and drug smuggling in Afghanistan, Public Opinion in Iran, Peter Mandelsons diary , 7/7 bombings etc etc

Most mainstream journalists are not really journalists, they are commentators.

You would need a lot of money to set something like that up.
dreamkatcher
Member
#119 | Posted: 13 Jan 2010 22:07
Reply 
Private Eye worth a read at times, but I think you are right about a "proper" paper.

DK
infiniteawareness
Member
#120 | Posted: 14 Jan 2010 09:24
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
It's so hard to know what to believe these days. Once the penny drops and you realise whats happened to mainstream news you get scraps of evidence from various sources.

What I would like to see is a totally independant monthly newspaper, with real investigative journalism. Maybe cover 2 or 3 stories in depth each month - from UK and worldwide. A team of journaists working solid for 3 weeks or so on each story getting to the bottom of it.

This month we investigate:
CIA and drug smuggling in Afghanistan, Public Opinion in Iran, Peter Mandelsons diary , 7/7 bombings etc etc

Most mainstream journalists are not really journalists, they are commentators.

You would need a lot of money to set something like that up.

What i am saying is that most of these if not all are staged False Flag events and the gullible British public are gonna believe it all. As you know this is done through the compliant media and is literally Newspeak. That is the message that i am trying get across but if people on here don't want to debate it or don't respect my opinion how the hell are you gonna change anything?
Today on bbc breakfast time there were 3 news items which are significant:
Microchipping Dogs
Port Au Prince Earthquake
A story about Autism(which actual discussed Shamanism and healing in a positive way)

If you don't value my opinions or my Working Class values i shall consider taking my opinions to another forum.
There is a newspaper available like you want, it is called THE UK COLUMN.

Kind Regards
IA
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  6  7  8  9  10  ...  41  42  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®