RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

2012

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  109  110  111  112  113  ...  117  118  »» 
skipman
Member
#1651 | Posted: 22 Oct 2013 21:54
Reply 
Take a look at how many police officers and others in positions of influence have been found up to their necks in child porn.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/oct/20/childrensservices.crime?CMP=twt_gu
skipman
Member
#1652 | Posted: 22 Oct 2013 22:27
Reply 
The authorities tell us,"if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear" So why is Saville's interview notes censored when it comes to any mention of the royal family?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2468836/Jimmy-Savile-Police-censored-2009-int erview-removing-reference-Royal-Family.html
skipman
Member
#1653 | Posted: 18 Nov 2013 00:20
Reply 
skipman
Member
#1654 | Posted: 18 Nov 2013 21:30
Reply 
Jimmy Saville and the BBC,the story rumbles on,much to the Beebs despair.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2508568/Revealed-Tape-shows-BBC-chief-did-kno w-Savile-probe.html
skipman
Member
#1655 | Posted: 25 Nov 2013 16:19
Reply 
i posted a while ago about a female Canadian judge Lori Douglas. The case is still dragging on,after three years.

Warning some pictures you may find not to your taste.

http://henrymakow.com/2013/11/judicial-panel-quits.html
skipman
Member
#1656 | Posted: 8 Dec 2013 19:44
Reply 
skipman
Member
#1657 | Posted: 21 Dec 2013 08:47
Reply 
The Telegraph's report on the Rochdale sex grooming scandal.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10529794/Colour-blind-social-workers-cou ldnt-see-glaring-racial-clues-to-Rochdale-sex-abuse.html

Has society become so bogged down with PC and working guidelines, that it can no longer operate in a way that most of us would consider commonsense?

A few years ago the Keighley Labour M.P. Ann Cryer made a public announcement about the Asian sexual grooming of white girls,when the police refused to act.

After apologies were made to placate the public and new procedures set up to stop the repeat of such acts. It still goes on.

http://www.keighleynews.co.uk/news/news_keighley/10841259.Seven_new_claims_of_groomin g__in_Keighley/
skipman
Member
#1658 | Posted: 19 Jan 2014 13:09
Reply 
The news week has been full of sex abuse trials.

Here is part of DLT's trial.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/bbc-edited-dave-lee-travis-sex-attack-out-of-top -of-the-pops-9067486.html
skipman
Member
#1659 | Posted: 19 Jan 2014 19:35
Reply 
Now that McAlpine has died we may get some light shone in the direction of the M.P's.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/453381/Female-MP-abused-boy-in-care
skipman
Member
#1660 | Posted: 1 Mar 2014 22:32
Reply 
The Harriet Harman/ Daily Mail non scoop.

This article states it best."Why now" its old news known about and not acted upon for years.

Why have Tory M.P.'s been told not to comment? Probably because someone might bring up the case of Tory M.P. dickens who gave a file of information to them Tory Home Secretary about peadophiles, who said before the house of commons that he would investigate and...........nothing.

Then there is the news of Operation Ore. Over seven thousand British men involved with child porn, many of them high ranking business men and politicians. Who were going to be interviewed by the police and questioned about credit card payments to view child porn over the internet. what happened to that report?......Nothing.

Then there was the news that the House of Commons computers were used to view porn sites twenty five thousand times. What happened to the freedom of information request to find out which M.P.s computers were used for such lurid viewings?.....Nothing.

Anyone detecting a pattern here?
skipman
Member
#1661 | Posted: 2 Mar 2014 20:27
Reply 
This from Vigilant Citizen.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/dont-make-go-back-mommy-creepy-childrens-book-s atanic-ritual-abuse/

When people say Satanic Ritual Abuse does not exist, refer them to the case at the end of the article.

Then they may realise why nothing was/will be done about anything from the above post.
skipman
Member
#1662 | Posted: 2 Mar 2014 22:10
Reply 
Just to show that it is not only British and American politicians who are into child porn.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/suspicion-reins-in-merkel-cabinet-followi ng-child-porn-fallout-a-954268.html
skipman
Member
#1663 | Posted: 6 Mar 2014 20:40
Reply 
Has anyone heard of the NCA? the National Crime Agency is a new branch of the police and would appear to be very separate from the ordinary police.

An ex government advisor was arrested over child porn and sexual harassment charges, in secret. Hmmm.

http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/03/05/meet-britains-new-fbi-camerons-new-nca-branded- as-secret-police-already-courting-controversy/
skipman
Member
#1664 | Posted: 6 Mar 2014 21:13
Reply 
skipman:
An ex government advisor was arrested over child porn and sexual harassment charges, in secret. Hmmm.

The government are going to have to work hard to spin this in a good light. The guy was helping Cameron set family friendly porn filters for the internet,would you believe?

I suggest they use the guys who came up with a brilliant spin to a certain American politicians family secret. He had an uncle who was hung for horse theft,among other crimes.

Here is how his back room boys interpreted his ancestors past. Its pure genius.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=92125
skipman
Member
#1665 | Posted: 21 Mar 2014 17:02
Reply 
There cannot be anything worse than paedophile priests,except the bishops that protect them.

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/court-hears-paedophile-priest-said-sex-abuse-was-the-lords- work-20140318-350ey.html#ixzz2wbjIWH5V
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  109  110  111  112  113  ...  117  118  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®