RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

WORLD CONTROL / NWO

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  70  71  72  73  74  ...  389  390  »» 
CTRILEY
Member
#1066 | Posted: 19 Sep 2010 11:04 | Edited by: CTRILEY
Reply 
First Century Christians created anti-Semitism, whilst the Catholic Church perpetuated it so much that it led to the very Holocaust which the Catholic Church refused to condemn. As part of its policy to exterminate all non-Christians, Pope Urban II proclaimed the 1st crusade. The invasion of Ireland on 1169 which led to centuries of blood shed had Papal support, but continued as long as the Vatican got a cut of the profits.

When a failing feudal system, corrupt church, poor hygiene and bad farming methods led to wars, famine and plagues, the Catholic Church blamed the Jews until Pope Gregory IX blamed witches. But it was Pope John XXII who defined a witch as anyone whose beliefs were contrary to the doctrines of Rome.

There was Papal support for the African slave trade, the oppression of Irish Catholics under the Penal laws and it's official policy during the famine of "let them starve". During the 1930's atheists were the ones who warned the world against the Nazis fightiong them in Spain and in the streets of Britian, whilst the Church and British nobility both financially and idealogical supported the Nazis. The Catholic Church refused to comdemn the Holocaust as the Nazi's were doing to the Jew, Gypsies, gays, etc., exactly what the Chruch had been preaching for centuries. Then there centuries of protecting paedophiles, etc., all of which shows that the Pope Benedict XVI and Emperor Palpatine look a like, has no moral right to condemn or tell anyone what to do.

All faiths contain eternal truths, but belief can't change the reality that over 130 planets exist outside our solar system. Faith can't change the fact that the universe is over 13 billion years old or that the night sky is filled with stars and galaxies within our universe whose light has taken millions and billions of years to reach us, negating the possibility of creation occurring in 4004 BC.
dark star
Member
#1067 | Posted: 19 Sep 2010 16:31
Reply 
Yes,and why should our cash strapped society pay a single penny towards the promotion of the worlds richest institute ?

If RCC wants to rescue its corrupt and evil empire then let them finance it,not the British public who couldn,t care less weather an 83 year man in a funny hat visits the UK or not.
Joe
Member
#1068 | Posted: 19 Sep 2010 22:53 | Edited by: Joe
Reply 
What the hell has this dirty, old bastard (The Pope) achieved by coming over here?, apart from gaining a crowd full of deluded sheeple. There is no point in talking to this herd of gatherers, they have no reasoning/Intelligence to see through this polava (and no good for anything else in general).

So let's move on then. Through our taxes they have taken 12,000,000 (or more) from the public - was that amount really all for security? Then he goes to see the old hag - I mean the queen.

What are they discussing, that they can't say over the phone etc, (must be secret dirty business as usual) and spare us all that money!

I can only think it must be more than just a "state visit", something the establishment does not want the rest of us to know about. Whatever it is, it will not be in the public's best interest - as none of these so called "stately visits" ever are.

I wonder if the queen signed away an extra secret cheque of our money - for the Pope?

(And I would like to bet it's a hell lot more than 12,000,000).
Joe
Member
#1069 | Posted: 20 Sep 2010 00:17 | Edited by: Joe
Reply 

With all that paraphernalia he wears, he still looks no different to me!

dreamkatcher
Member
#1070 | Posted: 20 Sep 2010 01:21
Reply 
Big probs with mail in & out. Cant use e-mail address. Back asap, when fixed.
dark star
Member
#1071 | Posted: 20 Sep 2010 20:45
Reply 
dreamkatcher:
Big probs with mail in & out. Cant use e-mail address. Back asap, when fixed.

Try pressing on recieve/send.........that normally does the trick.
dreamkatcher
Member
#1072 | Posted: 20 Sep 2010 23:45
Reply 
haha. I wish.....!
dreamkatcher
Member
#1073 | Posted: 21 Sep 2010 20:50
Reply 
Gov't actually says that they are spraying Barium (toxic) in the Che
Posted by: "Grannie's" GrannieFox@gmail.com
Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:56 pm (PDT)


*//*
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:28 PM,

Gov't actually says that they are spraying Barium (read toxic) in the
Chemtrails and it's now on the news!

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/181/268/Government_ADMITS_Secretly_SPRAYING_POISON_On_ Us.html

lazyhorse
Member
#1074 | Posted: 22 Sep 2010 00:28
Reply 
it's great that it's been on msm news. and at [2:12] in the video, they show the senate house ruling refering to arial spraying programs and "chemtrails" by name. if only starseed were here. he couldn't buck this one.
dreamkatcher
Member
#1075 | Posted: 22 Sep 2010 04:54
Reply 
Dont kid yourself. I bet he could...
dreamkatcher
Member
#1076 | Posted: 22 Sep 2010 12:32
Reply 
Health News

Swine flu vaccine to be included in winter flu jab
The swine flu vaccine is to be included in the winter flu jab for the first time in a bid to stop the virus from returning.


By Laura Roberts
Published: 7:30AM BST 20 Sep 2010

6 Comments
The swine flu vaccine is to be included in the winter flu jab for the first time in a bid to stop the virus from returning.
The swine flu vaccine is to be included in the winter flu jab for the first time in a bid to stop the virus from returning. Photo: Getty Images

Combining immunisation against the flu with the swine flu vaccine would prevent people from being able to turn down the swine flu jab without also missing out on the usual protection against winter flu viruses.

However, concerns have been raised about the swine flu vaccine after possible side-effects from the vaccine were reported in several European countries. The Department of Health said it intended to reassure patients that the vaccine was safe.

Related Articles

*
Swine flu vaccine safety probed
*
Link between swine flu jab and deadly syndrome will be probed
*
Swine flu: intensive care beds will be swamped experts warn
*
Swine flu: vaccines for half population to be delivered by December, ministers say
*
Swine flu: don't coo over newborn babies, experts warn
*
Swine flu a threat to home births

The government has more than 30 million swine flu vaccines left over after responding to the outbreak of the swine flu pandemic last year.

The World Health Organisation has advised governments to keep issuing the vaccine during the "post pandemic" period to protect against a possible resurgence of the H1N1 strain.

The Department for Health has decided to implement the advice immediately.

Up to 7 million people have the seasonal flu jab each year and it is offered to vulnerable groups such as people over 65, those with heart disease or chest problems, diabetics, and a range of others.

Last year 4.5million people were vaccinated against swine flu focusing mainly on frontline health workers, pregnant women and the under-fives. However, millions turned down the vaccination because they were concerned that it had not been fully tested.

The safety of a swine flu vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) was investigated by European drugs regulators after possible links to narcolepsy, a rare condition which causes people to fall asleep suddenly.

Health officials in Finland suspended the vaccination programme in August this year following reports of narcolepsy in eight people who had received the jab.

So far there have been 27 reports of suspected narcolepsy in people across Europe who had previously been vaccinated with Pandemrix, the H1N1 swine flu vaccine made by GSK.

A further ten cases have been reported in Sweden, six in France, and one each in Germany and Norway. There have been no reported cases in Britain.

The Department of Health said the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority, which monitors vaccines, had given the H1N1 jab the all-clear after fears in Europe over the narcolepsy outbreak.

She said: "By March this year, that vaccine had been given out 5.5million times and there have been no reported cases of narcolepsy in Britain. There is very little change to the seasonal flu vaccination which will still protect against a large number of flu viruses. It is simply that the swine flu vaccine has been added. People will be notified of this when they receive their invitation letters to get the jab so it won't be a surprise."

In December last year, the European Medicines Agency expressed concerns that children given a second dose of the single swine flu vaccine may also develop a high fever.

Parents and doctors were urged to keep watch on a child's temperature after research found they were more likely to suffer a fever following the second dose compared with after the first. Youngsters were also more likely to suffer soreness at the site of injection as well as drowsiness, irritability and loss of appetite after the second dose.


In Britain 457 people died during the swine flu pandemic which cost the government more than 1.2billion.

The report said there was a lack of flexibility once the Department of Health signed contracts for swine flu vaccines with the drug manufacturers GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Baxter.

Baxter agreed to a "break clause" allowing the Government to cancel its order for some of the doses but GSK refused.
dreamkatcher
Member
#1077 | Posted: 22 Sep 2010 12:39
Reply 
September 22, 2010 www.coasttocoastam.com Coast Insider Audio



Privacy, Tracking, & Technology:

In the first half of Tuesday's show, consumer privacy advocate Katherine Albrecht discussed the ways companies and the government are tracking people's behavior via RFID chips and the Internet. China has been using technology to track and suppress dissidents, and as the U.S. moves toward becoming "a sort of Big Brother top-down surveillance-based police state, I could see something like that happening here," she cautioned. Homeland Security has deliberately chosen the least secure type of RFID to incorporate into Americans' driver's licenses because they plan to piggyback onto the private sector's tracking infrastructure, and then pull their records when they see fit, she continued.

The single biggest privacy issue is Google-- they have quietly amassed the biggest dossier of personal information on individuals in the history of the world, Albrecht declared. "Google knows what your backyard looks like because they've got the Google satellite up in the sky...what the front of your house looks like because they've got the Google van driving around snapping pictures," and they know about your medical conditions and other personal information based on your Internet searches, she said. Regarding all of Google's free products, she commented: "When was the last time a multi-billion dollar corporation gave you all its products for free? The answer is never, because those aren't products. They're bait and you are the product." As far as search engines, she recommends people use startpage.com instead of Google, as this site doesn't retain data on users.

---------------------------

Appearing in the second half of the show, Internet and privacy expert Lauren Weinstein spoke about various issues related to the web. Regarding a recent case where a Google engineer was fired for accessing private data, and then stalking some teenage Google users, there are checks and balances that could be put into place to lessen such occurrences, such as multiple staff people needed to access customer data, he noted.

"Cookies" and other tracking technologies on the web are employed with customers knowing little or nothing about them, said Weinstein, who added that a recent Wall St. Journal investigation found some sites were quite intrusive, using more than 100 tracking tools on visitors. One of the best ways for people to protect their computers from viruses and malware is to keep their software up-to-date, as new exploits sometimes come in fast and furious, he added.



Pic Fix:

A gallery of Animal Pictures of the Week, features intriguing photos from zoos around the world, including a baby wombat peeking out, a meerkat cuddling with a lion, and a bear stretching into a yoga-like position.

Today in Strangeness:

Happy Autumnal Equinox! Night and day are of approximately equal length on most of the planet this Wednesday. On this day in 1990, Brit Steve Woodmore was declared the world's fastest talker, blabbing 595 words in 56 seconds. The loquacious American, Fran Capo holds the Guinness World Record as the fastest-talking female.

Tonight's Show, Wednesday, September 22nd:

Board certified in disaster medicine and adviser for FEMA's NW region, Geoffrey Simmons will discuss preparedness as well as his work with Darwin, Creation and the evolution of man.
Starseed
Guest
#1078 | Posted: 22 Sep 2010 13:08
Reply 
lazyhorse:
it's great that it's been on msm news. and at [2:12] in the video, they show the senate house ruling refering to arial spraying programs and "chemtrails" by name. if only starseed were here. he couldn't buck this one.

dreamkatcher:
Dont kid yourself. I bet he could...

The reporter misunderstood the results, and said there was a lot of Barium
The reporter now admits he was mistaken, and that he found no evidence for chemtrails



Some conspiracy theorists think that persistent spreading contrails indicate some kind of deliberate aerial spraying, probably by the government. They speculate as to what could be in these trails, and one of the most common things they claim is barium.

Some people are so obsessed by this idea that they have rainwater tested to see if it has barium in it. They usually find some, and then trumpet this as evidence that their theory is correct.



Unfortunately they are wrong. I'll explain why, but first, some basic science.

What is Barium?
Barium is a metal, like calcium. You never find it in its metal form (outside of a lab), as it oxidizes rapidly in the air. Instead you'll find compounds, usually barium sulfate or barium carbonate. Barium compounds are used in the plastics, rubber, electronics and textile industries, in ceramic glazes and enamels, in glass-making, brick-making and paper-making, as a lubricant additive, in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, in case-hardening of steel and in the oil and gas industry as a wetting agent for drilling mud. Barium in water comes primarily from natural sources as it is present as a trace element in both igneous and sedimentary rocks. Barium is generally present in air in particulate form as a result of industrial emissions, particularly from combustion of coal and diesel oil and waste incineration.

and Parts Per ...
When you measure the concentration of a substance in water, you can express it in various ways. You have to pay attention to units when converting from one way to another.

A liter of water weighs 1 kilogram, which is 1000 grams.

A milligram is 1/1000th (a thousandth) of a gram. 1mg = 1 milligram = 0.001g

A microgram is 1/1000000 (a millionth) of a gram. 1ug = 1g = 1 microgram

Note that last line, because it's important. The symbol is the greek letter "mu". In measuring, it's used to mean "micro", or "millionth". (To type , hold down the Alt key, type 230 on the numeric keypad, and then release the Alt key). Since it's difficult to type, it's often written using the letter "u". Make sure you understand the difference between a milligram (mg, 1/1000th or a gram) and a microgram (g, ug, 1/1000000th of a gram). A milligram is thousandth, not a millionth. It's a little confusing sometimes.

A microgram is a millionth of a gram, so it's a billionth of a kilogram. Since there are 1000 grams in a kilogram, and 1,000,000 micrograms in a gram, there are 1,000,000,000 g in a kilogram. All this is basic high school science.

Concentration in water is measured as ppm, ppb, g/L, mg/L, g/L. These are parts per million, parts per billion, grams per liter, milligrams per liter and micrograms per liter. We can convert between these easily:
1 ppm = 1 mg/L = 1000 ppb = 1000 g/L
1 ppb = 1 g/L = 0.001 ppm = 0.001 mg/L
(remember that 1 Liter is 1000 grams, so 1 mg in one liter is a thousandth of a gram in one thousand grams, or 1 part in a million).

Chemtrail claims
This video is very popular right now. Claiming that water was analyzed and found to have barium in it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB-489l6MI




The video was taken in Stamps, Arkansas, which is not entirely surprising as that's in a region of the US the might be renamed "Contrail Alley". It's at the intersection of the cross country routes between the West Coast, and the major airport in Atlanta, Orlando and Jacksonville. Stamps is midway between the two major regional VORs (Texarkana and El Dorado), right next to the major East-West airway Victor V278, and on the edge of a MOA that traffic has to skirt occasionally. It's also directly below the Atlanta to Dallas, San Antonio to New York and Houston to Chicago flight routes. On just ONE of these routes (Atlanta to Dallas) there is a scheduled commuter flight, directly overhead, at contrail altitude every 15 minutes! The same frequency of flights is found on the Houston-Chicago route, which crosses at right angles almost exactly overhead. Hence, when the weather is right, it is inevitable that you will see contrails in a grid pattern, "a giant checkerboard". See this Google Earth file: airlines-over-stamps.kmz

But back to the video. It shows a jar of dirty water (collected 9/1/2007), which was collected by Bill Nichols. He's posted some comments on the YouTube video describing how he collected the water:



it was rainwater. i collected it in two separate bowls on the hood of a pickup truck in my backyard. we are 25 miles from the nearest interstate. this is a very poor county, the only industry is chickens, logging , farming, a little oilno coal burners or anything like that. i wasn't looking for attention. i was looking for answers, ksla said they would pay to get it tested. i dropped it off, and they asked my opinion

i put 2 clean bowls there specifically because i wanted to catch what was falling. i don't recall exactly when i put the bowls there, but they were there for about a month before i contacted ksla. the goo that i caught was full of barium. have a cool day!

Pause for a second, and consider if you left a bowl out for the month of August in rural Arkansas, what would you expect to find in it after a month? Some dirty water? Perhaps a little dust? What's dust made of outdoor? Dirt, dried topsoil. What would you expect to find in the dirt in Arkansas one of the richest sources of barium in the US? You'd expect a bit of Barium but did they actually find any more than you'd get in tap water?

This dirty water was tested, the test results are available in full here. You can also see the results in the video, at around 00:55 to 00:59. Here they are pieced together.



And just to be clear, here's a closeup of the results, and the units:





That's quite straightforward right? Barium found at 68.8 g/L. That's 68.8 parts per billion. Now listen to the audio at that precise point (also transcribed on the KSLA web site):

"The results: a high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million (ppm), more than three times the toxic level set by the EPA".

Immediately you can see something is wrong here. it's 68.8, not 6.8, and it's not parts per million, it's parts per billion. So it's actually 0.0688 parts per million.

And what of "three times the toxic level set by the EPA"? They are referring to the EPA Limits, as quoted by the CDC:

"The EPA has set a limit of 2.0 milligrams of barium per liter of drinking water (2.0 mg/L), which is the same as 2 ppm [parts per million]."

So the EPA limit is 2 ppm (2000 g/L), and the tests actually found 0.0688 ppm (68.8 g/L), just 3.4% of the allowable limit.

That limit's not really a "toxic level" either. There's no evidence that it would be toxic even at that level (which, remember, is 29 times higher than what was actually found). The world health organization has set a drinking water level of 7 ppm after doing studies into the health effects of barium.

Barium has always been in water
The WHO also reported on the barium levels in drinking water (meaning, from a tap, not some dirty puddle) and they found:

"In a study of water supplies of cities in the USA, a median value of 43 g/litre was reported; in 94% of all determinations, the concentrations found were below 100g/litre (IPCS, 1990)"

So the average was 43 g/L, but most were below 100g/L. This means the amount of Barium found in this supposed chemtrail residue was about the same as was found in the municipal water supplies in the US, back in 1990. This is pretty low, it varies with geography based on the type of rocks in the aquifer. In Tuscany, Italy, the Barium in drinking water was around 1000g/L (1ppm), high, but still within safe limits.

The amount of barium will also vary based on the weather. Very heavy rains will leach more barium out into the groundwater. So you'd expect more barium after very rainy seasons. This is actually what you find if you look at the historical records in California (which has very uneven annual rainfall). You see spikes in barium whenever there is a wet year after a dry year. Recent years like these are 1991, 1995, 1998 and 2004 (2001 and 2003 also spiked to a lesser extent). The expected peaks were confirmed by the results of Rosalind Peterson at California Skywatch.

So what's going on here? Chemtrail theorists are constantly claiming that "chemtrails" are made of barium, and that it's affecting our health. But whenever water is tested, it is found to have perfectly normal levels of barium, which vary as expected based on the rainfall. In the cases where they claim it's got an unusual amount, this is just a misunderstanding of the units and limits involved.

Yes, there is barium in the drinking water, there always has been, and always will be. Trace amounts, mostly from the environment and some industrial pollution. It's a very small amount, and not dangerous. There is no evidence to suggest it has anything to do with "chemtrails."

Update #1: 5/2/2009
Jeff Ferrall, the reporter in the story now says:

Starseed
Guest
#1079 | Posted: 22 Sep 2010 13:13 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
Update #1: 5/2/2009
Jeff Ferrall, the reporter in the story now says:

http://contrailscience.com/barium-chemtrails/comment-page-8/#comment-23164

Yes, I did make corrections to my first report, which originally aired almost 2-years ago now... after quickly realizing my very embarrassing mistake. I was not happy with myself. Unfortunately, the first version of my report got out to the internet before I could make the correction(s), and the wrong version is shown repeatedly.
...
My feeling is, and maybe you'd agree, that if such aerosol mixes were created and loaded into jets with either a separate/independent dispersal method other than the exhaust, or actually in the fuel itself... somewhere, somehow, you'd expect someone to talk. I have not heard that yet.
...
I also interviewed the scientist who originally patented what some believe was a precursor to so-called chemtrail technology. He's a very kind, helpful man who could not have been more helpful. He says he knows nothing about any such conspiracy.

There's also a mention of this story In Skeptical Enquirer magazine:
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/curious_contrails_death_from_the_sky/

Update#2: 3/14/2010
More people make the same mistake. This time someone in Austrailia, and the story was picked up by a Los Angeles environmentalist. Again mg is confused with g, making the results 1000 times as high:

http://www.examiner.com/x-10438-Human-Rights-Examiner~y2010m3d13-video-White-Clouds-o f-Death-Aussie-exposes-geoengineered-chemtrail-contents?#comments



------------------------------
dreamkatcher:
Dont kid yourself. I bet he could...

Thanks for the vote of confidence DK, it took 5 minutes to find this stuff.

lazyhorse:
it's great that it's been on msm news. and at [2:12] in the video, they show the senate house ruling refering to arial spraying programs and "chemtrails" by name. if only starseed were here. he couldn't buck this one.

dreamkatcher
Member
#1080 | Posted: 22 Sep 2010 13:17
Reply 
Chemical Hell on Earth
Pharmaceutical - Chemical Radioactive


From whatever point of rationalization or greed it is clear that certain groups of corporations with government support have deliberately created a toxic hell on our planet. It's a special kind of hell that gets chemically and radioactively more toxic each year with the damage and danger expanding to hurt, debilitate, torture, and even kill people in uncountable numbers. Welcome to planet earth.

The weight of evidence based on the findings of wildlife biologists, toxicologists, and epidemiologists clearly indicates that the world's populations are being exposed to a host of chemical contaminants and heavy metals. And even radiation exposures are headed upward with the medical establishment's stubborn use of radiation in diagnostic tests, its use in the treatment of cancer and the insane use of depleted uranium on distant battlefields.

Chronic disease is the number one killer in the United States, accounting for about four out of five deaths in America each year yet most doctors have not the slightest idea of what is really causing this. The medical establishment has not been able to solve or cure any of the chronic diseases facing humanity simply because they don't really want to know anything about the causes. So medical officials go on and on about the flu and about viruses instead of addressing the fact that pharmaceutical medicine are one of the greatest sources of toxic exposure and so is dentistry. Actually this is a plan by design of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, meaning the pharmaceutical giants have manipulated the entire bunch of us patients and doctors to continue to look to their pharmaceutical drugs as the end all, be all of these chronic diseases. Their sole intent is to keep us on their drugs, not to find a real cure, and it's of little consequence to them that these drugs cause harm and suffering.

There are poisonous time bombs going off in billions of mouths
and few in medicine and dentistry are aware of it. Why dentistry
did not study mercury chemistry before 1000s of tons were
implanted two inches from the brain and why allopathic medicine did
not scream out warnings are questions we will be asking for a long time.

Most doctors, dentists and health officials have been brainwashed; they cannot see the forest for the trees when it comes to toxicity. This has been deliberate. Medicine and dentistry are among the worst polluters of the human biosphere so they are the last ones who will come to grips with Toxicity Syndrome. Contemporary medicine is now threatened with its own demise because as toxicity rises in the world (and intensely in certain areas) we become more sensitive and sick not from viruses, bacteria and fungus but from chemical poisoning. As toxicity saturates our bodies any new threat shoves us hard over the line causing a syndrome known as blue flu, chemically induced flu [1] as is occurring in the states affected by the Gulf Oil Spill right now.

We had to move from Kenner, Louisiana because everyone in my family came down with headaches, nausea, and vomiting. But when two of us started having blood in our urine and feces, I did my research and this is case book symptoms of Corexit use. I started to document the plants in the yard and the garden. The leaves would have various colored spots and then decay. Also a white baby-powder-looking substance would cover some leaves. One day I actually went out and found oil on some plants. We moved farther north and the symptoms went away.

To understand Toxicity Syndromeone has to understand the equations, the factors that mix and become strong etiologies of disease. Today it is clearer than ever that our main health concern is toxic exposures meeting head on with severe nutritional deficiencies, which leave people and their children more vulnerable to toxic insults and thus to disease itself.

According to the Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) about 100 million Americans, more than one-third of the population, suffer from some form of chronic disease like asthma, diabetes, cancer, heart and kidney disease or arthritis. Cancer is the second leading cause of death, exceeded only by heart disease. Among children ages 1 to 14, cancer is now the leading cause of death by disease. [2] At current rates, invasive cancer will be diagnosed in half of all men and in one in three women in their lifetime. "Whether it is cancer or autism that is affecting our families and showing up in our examination rooms, the growing rates of chronic disease compel us to search for clues and answers to determine the true causes of these increasingly prevalent illnesses," says the PSR.

How many of us know that on August 1st of 2006 the American Chemical Society published research that showed conclusively that methylmercury induces pancreatic cell apoptosis and dysfunction. [3] Mercury is a well-known toxic agent that produces various types of cell and tissue damage yet governmental health agencies diminish the importance of this fact exposing billions of people to levels of mercury harmful to pancreatic health. In the case of diabetes mercury is especially telling for it affects the beta cells, the insulin itself, and the insulin receptor sites setting off a myriad of complex disturbances in glucose metabolism. But hey, why not inject everyone, even pregnant women, with another round of mercury-containing flu vaccines?A little more toxic hell is not going to hurt anybody right?

Human destiny is on a collision course with contemporary medicine, dentistry and the pharmaceutical companieswho have been poisoning humanity and making a lot of money doing so. Drug companies have been accused of conning the public by hyping up patented medicines while downplaying their potentially harmful side-effects. A new study [4]estimates that 85 percent of new drugs offer few if any new benefits while having the potential to cause serious harm due to toxicity and misuse.

The margin of safety which researchers thought to be present with
regards to health effects of amalgam does not exist. Sensitive persons
can be damaged because of mercury in their mouths. Amalgam as
soon as possible should be banned in the whole European Union.
Professor Maths Berlin
Former WHO leading expert on the effects of mercury

Human destiny is on a collision course with mercury, not carbon dioxide. Tomorrow we will all wake up to a world with about twenty tons more mercury in the environment, hundreds of pounds of mercury will be put into people's mouths by dentists, and tens of thousands oflittle children will receive vaccinations laced withmercury in the form of ethyl-mercury, super-charged with aluminum. Human destiny is on a collision course with many things but carbon dioxide is not one of them. It was a truly idiotic notion to present a healthy gas as dangerous while losing track of the real threats. In my book Sodium Bicarbonate, I present the real story of carbon dioxide because that is what bicarbonate turns into in the stomach when taken orally. CO2 is a healthy and necessary gas whereas mercury is a deadly substance that only insane doctors and dentists insist on continuing to use.

A careful reading of the published medical research clearly demonstrates that all sensible concern for published scientific research regarding the toxicity of mercury has been cast aside exposing the entire world's population to grave unwarranted harm. [5].

Human destiny is also on a collision course with pesticides. Pesticides, herbicides and fungicides are showing up in everyone's blood affecting people's and children's brains. Children whose mothers were exposed to certain types of pesticides while pregnant were more likely to have attention problems as they grew up. A study published in the August 2010 issue of Environmental Health Perspectives, adds to evidence that organophosphate pesticides affects the human brain.

Researchers at the University of California Berkeley tested pregnant women for evidence that organophosphate pesticides had actually been absorbed by their bodies, and then followed their children as they grew. Women with more chemical traces of the pesticides in their urine while pregnant had children more likely to have symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, at age 5, the researchers found.



Recent months have seen health scandal after health scandal making headlines in the U.S. Two of the world's biggest pharmaceutical companies have been fined billions of dollars after investigations into their secret working practices. What these cases have revealed will eventually change the way the drug industry is perceived forever. Revelations have emerged of pervasive fraud, fatal side effects, and huge kickbacks paid to doctors as the above video illustrates.

Honest Medicine?

At least some people in the world are asking for honest, better-qualified doctors who have been trained in the realities of human life and disease. Some patients and theirfamily members are so fed up with doctors and nurses that they are actually attacking them. Shenyang China reported 152 "severe conflicts" between patients and doctors last year. Dissatisfaction with medical care is common in the cities across China. Chinese hospitals are actually dangerous places for health professionals to work. In 2006, the last year the Health Ministry published statistics on hospital violence, attacks by patients or their relatives injured more than 5,500 medical workers. [6]

In June a doctor was stabbed to death in Shandong Province by the son of a patient who had died of liver cancer. Three doctors were severely burned in Shanxi Province when a patient set fire to a hospital office. A pediatrician in Fujian Province was also injured after leaping out a fifth-floor window to escape angry relatives of a newborn who had died under his care. In the United States people choose to sue instead of stab but the reasons for people to
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  70  71  72  73  74  ...  389  390  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®