RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

WORLD CONTROL / NWO

 Page:  ««  1  2  3  4  5  ...  381  382  383  384  385  »» 
CTRILEY
Member
#16 | Posted: 25 May 2009 09:10 | Edited by: CTRILEY
Reply 
Just watched the episode about the and in which was mentioned the Global domain perspective. This idea is to change the world so that countries serve the interests of the USA, which in effect creates an American Empire in all but name. This plan includes for the destruction of democratic systems and governments where and when necessary, removal of dictators and regimes who cease to be America's puppets (such as Saddam Hussien), invading countries to control resources (Afghanistan and Iraq).

Part of the GDP is the son of Star Wars programme, which saw nuclear test ban treaties ripped up to not only to allow for the development of a new generation of battlefield weaponry, but to allow for the placement of nuclear weapons in space. Space Shuttle burnt up during re-entry whilst doing some of the preparation work for this. By placing nuclear weapons in space, the US can threaten to nuke any country which doesn't play ball.

This is because the GDP is part of a plan a long time in the making, starting some claim gping back before and of which the American War of Independance was but a part. Whilst the USA's the Marshall Plan was officially to help rebuild countries devastated by WWII. But in reality it was designed to strengthen America's territorial control, sphere of influence and position it as an up and coming world power by aiding only those countries who had fought in the war, had rejected Communism, would end their empires and allow the stationing of American forces within its territories. There is something like 220 countires on this planet with US bases (give or take) in 150 of them and they're all dancing to America's tune. Anyone want to guess who or what is calling that tune?
monkeyboy
Member
#17 | Posted: 27 May 2009 00:15
Reply 
Hail to the chief ?
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#18 | Posted: 1 Jun 2009 13:11 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
AIR FRANCE FLIGHT MISSING ...

The crew reported an electric short circuit. How on earth can you diagnose a short circuit sitting in a cockpit. What a load of crap. I am a chartered electrical engineer, if something short circuits it will produce a symptom. Sometimes it will cause a fuse or a circuit breaker to blow, or it may result in a system failing.

But there is no way a pilot could "diagnose" a short circuit sitting in his seat. The only way to diagnose a short circuit is by carring out a continuity test using a testing device such as a multi-meter. The pilot might lose power to instruments, but he cannot say it was a short circuit. If your car conked out on the motorway, you wouln't immediately know within second it's a short circuit.

They then changed this by saying that the planes own computer system (not the crew) reported the short circuit.

Let's see if they find the plane, and if they do, will it be the same one.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#19 | Posted: 1 Jun 2009 18:56 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
The story has changed yet again.

They changed it from short circuit fault caused by turbulance???, then fault caused by lightning.

By the way I do not think systems usually report "short circuit" as a type of fault. Normally things are report as "Fail", bulp fail, sensor fail, actuator fail, etc etc. Sometimes a fault might be CAUSED by a short circuit but I have never heard in my 20 years of electical and electronic engineering of systems reporting a "short circuit".

Now they have changed completely and are saying is was catastrophic mechanical failure, and they haven't even found the bloody plane. It's like somebosy stealing your car and then you saying, I think it has mechanical failure because it is missing - THEY ARE FULL OF SHIT.

It seems to me that the thing completely disappeared without any trace or message. Somebody with no engineering knowledge has possibly made up the "short circuit" fault, which has been reported on the news. It has since changed.

One expert was on and he said he "didn't know" whether the fault was reported by crew or the computer system.

The whole thing is mighty suspicious. If you have read Tim Goods latest book, many military aircarft have gone completely missing including crew when chasing UFOs.

This is the first to my knowledge of a passenger craft.

THIS COULD START THE DISCLOSURE PROCESS GUYS - IF IT IS NOT FOUND ....
Dave Hall
Member
#20 | Posted: 1 Jun 2009 19:54
Reply 
Richard,
I know that this is your field.
Questions ---------
Would turbulance, as stated, cause an electrical failure?
Why no MAYDAY call?
Why no emergency location beacons activated?
All very strange.
But must feel sorry for all the crew and passengers.
Dave
CTRILEY
Member
#21 | Posted: 1 Jun 2009 21:53 | Edited by: CTRILEY
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
The whole thing is mighty suspicious. If you have read Tim Goods latest book, many military aircarft have gone completely missing including crew when chasing UFOs.

This is the first to my knowledge of a passenger craft.

This is true. But what if it isn't down to a UFO or an accident?

In the past airliners have been destoryed by terrorists. Some of you may recall how during the 1980s the US Navy "accidently" shot down an Iranian Civilian Airliner.

Remember how a Korean Airliner's navigation system was incorrectly set causing it to fly into Russia. The US miltary saw it on their radar but didn't warn the pilots they were flying towards a top secret Russian base (using is a chance to test the Russia's defences), where it was shot down. One of those on board was a very contraversial American Senator the US Governemnt wished would just go away.

Equally there are claims of US intelligence involvement in the Lockibie disastor. Then there are the events of 9/11 which help divert attention from the disclosure conference. Whilst forming part of wider plans.

I'm not bashing the USA, but I make reference to these events to show that in the past airliners have been shot down by those in power. Now disclosure is in the air, but the evidence presented isn't solid proof as there's nothing physical to show the world. Just accounts from people with only their reputations to back them up.

But how far would those in power go to rid themselves of somene about to go public with physical prove? What if the real story isn't just why it happened, but also about who was on the plane?
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#22 | Posted: 1 Jun 2009 23:47 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
If the plane crashed into the sea, with todays technology of satellites, high speed aircraft surely it would have been found by now.

If this case is UFO related, it is going to be hard to cover up. Maybe they are currently painting an Air France logo onto an identical plane and will crash it in the sea tomorrow for the press to film.

There was a case in Vietnam where a plane went missing and it was found in the jungle where it would have been impossible to land - completley in tact, I think with the crew missing? Anyone heard of that one?

It would be great if the the French plane was found in similar circumstances, except in a council estate in Scunthorpe with the passengers alive.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#23 | Posted: 2 Jun 2009 00:17 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Dave Hall:
Would turbulance, as stated, cause an electrical failure?
Why no MAYDAY call?
Why no emergency location beacons activated?
All very strange.
But must feel sorry for all the crew and passengers.

Hi Dave, I have not had any experience of aircraft; but I have had experience of electrical systems for trains, power stations, road traffic communications systems and systems for loading nuclear weapons in to submarines. The principals for electrical systems are all the same.

Would turbulance cause electric failure? -

When you go over a bump in your car, does this cause your cigarette lighter to stop working?

The answer is no,

Why no mayday call? - exactly and Why no aircraft found STILL!!!

I do not need to tell anyone on this forum the following, because you already know, but question every single fact you see on the News.

This whole thing is very bizzare, or as I sometimes say "This is Bob Lazar" ...
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#24 | Posted: 2 Jun 2009 02:06
Reply 
A friend of mine who is a travel agent was speaking to an Air France regional manager who is responsible for Charles de Gaulle airport at 3pm on Monday 1st June. My friend mentioned the missing aircraft situation because it had been on the News and he immediately he cut her off stating "There has been no official statement and I am not at liberty to talk about it".

She said it was clear he must have been sternly briefed not to say anything. She speaks with him on a regular basis and the conversation is usually open and honest.

In a world of internet, thousands of TV channels, radio, satellites & mobile phones you would think we would receive "THE TRUTH" quickly and simply via these means.

It is sad that we do not trust the News and need to resort to scraps of information from friends.
dark star
Member
#25 | Posted: 2 Jun 2009 12:55
Reply 
It must be said that out of all the thousands of flights worldwide the law of averages would suggest that at some point bad weather,explosion of some kind ect. is bound to happen.I would like to think the passengers and crew are safe and well drinking Andromidan coffee on board a city ship somewhere,I would,nt bet my house on it though!
God bless all those on board and their loved ones
DS
Dave Hall
Member
#26 | Posted: 2 Jun 2009 16:12
Reply 
News this afternoon , Some wreckage found floating in the sea.
Dave
dark star
Member
#27 | Posted: 2 Jun 2009 20:10
Reply 
The only way we will know for sure that this wreckage IS from this missing plane and that it is at the bottom of the ocean is when a body is recovered and identified,otherwise we only "know" what we are told.This may not be possible as its been said the depth of water in that part of the atlantic is 7000 Metres deep.My guess.....blown up or shot down.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#28 | Posted: 2 Jun 2009 22:45 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Article

Look at this link. There is an English woman whos husband was on the plane and she tried his mobile phone and it is still ringing!!!! He spoke to her on that phone just before he boarded the flight so it must have been on his person.

Why aren't questions being asked on the News. What type of phone is it? Is it a satellite phone? If not, which mast is picking up his signal! This whole thing stinks.

I checked on the ACARS system used on he Airbus for reporting messages. It does not have a fault code for "short circuit".
CTRILEY
Member
#29 | Posted: 2 Jun 2009 23:37 | Edited by: CTRILEY
Reply 
She spoke to him before he got on the plane and after he had checked in his luggage. Which means the phone was still on his person during the flight. Thus, based upon what we are led to believe it should now be on the floor of the seabed.

Whilst there are phones designed for divers (such as the Dräger UT 402), these attach directly to speically designed diving masks and thus wouldn't be used as a regular mobile phone.

According to the report it's a mobile phone. No different from any you can buy on any highstreet. Regular mobile phones are deisgned to be shock proof, splash proof and to some degree even water proof. But has anyone ever heard of an off the self mobile phone designed to withstand water pressure at the sea floor? Logically the phone couldn't withstand such water pressure, it would crack open, allowing water in and make the phone unworkable.
dark star
Member
#30 | Posted: 3 Jun 2009 13:11
Reply 
If this phone is still ringing does anyone have an idea why? Surely it would be turned off by an abductor! What about the theory that space junk hit the plane or even a meteorite.Is it impossible for lightning to take aplane down? So many questions I know,I rang a mate of mine this morning who is an " aviation nut " he builds and flies model aircraft, his oppinion is that the plane was " hit ". Now they are saying its unlikely the black box will be found, if this turns out to be the case then something is being hidden!
 Page:  ««  1  2  3  4  5  ...  381  382  383  384  385  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®