RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

CONTACTEES

 Page:  ««  1  2  3  ...  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  »» 
Starseed
Guest
#361 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 17:34 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
...
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#362 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 17:38
Reply 
Starseed:
nowhere close to providing un-debunkable proof.

Let us agree to disagree. I believe her work provides total proof. But how do you test proof. You need some sort of judgement process to test proof. So you can just say "it's not proof" and I can say "It is proof". There needs to be a judgement, of independent minds. Like a court. But how are you going to get that in today's sick media culture. You aren't. People who read her book can decide for themselves. I know what I have decided. I have decided the book is proof. My website has sold out of these books, probably the most popular product we have ever had on the site.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#363 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 17:42
Reply 
Starseed:
No you don`t you sound like a realist

Whether you are a realist or a pesamist, neither attitude ever achieves results. Only the optimist can make a difference in the world. Look at history. Did anyone ever get anywhere without optimism and courage to battle.
Desdichado
Member
#364 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 17:49
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
Did anyone ever get anywhere without optimism and courage to battle.

Prince William?
Starseed
Guest
#365 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 18:20 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
...
Starseed
Guest
#366 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 18:35 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
Well I did say agree to disagree first off (before a pointless repeated discussion started)

but seeing as you asked how you test proof and what judgement process, here`s my basic one:

-She claims that most of the WTC steel was pulverized ... Not true.
-She claims that car engines got melted around Ground Zero ..Not true.
- That`s just two (as we are agreeing to disagree and we don`t want to go on)

I`m sure there are a few things in the book that may well be true, but from what I have seen, a lot of it is not proof of anything. (IMO)

Also, if you read one persons account and take it all as the truth you are not being fair to yourself or the opposing viewpoints. I look at all sides and take nothing at face value.

Well I did say agree to disagree first off
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#367 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 19:17
Reply 
Starseed:
Game, set and Match! LOL

For give me, but what has Prince William achieved???? Nothing as far as I can see. He was given a title on a plate but has not achieved anything.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#368 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 19:18
Reply 
Strange I didn't see your email address among the purchasers of the book?
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#369 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 19:30 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Starseed:
RICHPLANET.NET:
You actually think that plane impacts caused what happened to the towers?

No. I believe not,

So you agree with her that planess didn't cause what happened. You agree with half of her argument. You just differ as to how the towers were gotten rid of?

Can you clarify the point. That you agree with her that planes didn't cause what happened to the towers?
Starseed
Guest
#370 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 19:35
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
Strange I didn't see your email address among the purchasers of the book?

If you mean me - no, I don`t buy into it for the reasons explained. Sorry chap, I know you whole heartedly believe everything Judy Wood says, but I have reservations. Some of her claims appear not to be as accurate as she makes out.

At the end of the day - she has never produced evidence of a DEW working so the whole thing falls flat doesn`t it? We can all examine photos and draw our own conclusions.
Starseed
Guest
#371 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 19:43 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
You just differ as to how the towers were gotten rid of?

Yes, probably. I lean towards this: (at the moment)

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have recently made their position very clear on this matter regarding Directed Energy Weapon theories. A new article written by Jonathan Cole, Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts shows many of the absurdities of Judy Wood's claims. The article is reproduced here, with some extra links I have added:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth_9853. html

And this:
With the amount of attention that the Pentagon no-plane theories have received, it shouldn't be surprising that some would also make the bizarre claim that no 767s hit the World Trade Center, despite voluminous video and photographic evidence to the contrary. My previous articles dealt with the core of these claims at length. Those articles were lengthy, so the purpose of this review is to provide a somewhat condensed and updated summary for those new to the subject or lacking in the time to delve into the details of the image analysis.

http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/review.html

And this:


http://letsrollforums.com/9-11-aircraft-parts-t20810.html?s=7e27cc32a24a3d41f0d13a13a 302b67d&amp;s=4c895f40799e4e33dfeaa6d2d9d59ce2&amp


FDNY EMT Briam Smith: "So we went up to the 10-10 house...I remember there was life jackets everywhere, the yellow in-flight life jackets, and that the contrast of the yellow against all the gray, you know. It stood out."
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#372 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 19:43
Reply 
Starseed:
she has never produced evidence of a DEW working

Just 500 pages and 800 images
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#373 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 19:49 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Had a look a that article and it doesn't really explain her findings. In particular the spire turning to dust. What a load of crap that, what we see was from an "explosion", also the explanation of circular holes. They'll have to come up with better arguments. These are aspects that they cannot explain in conventional terms.

We all agree it was a false flag operation lets not forget that. You think they used dynamite, others think they used something more exotic. let's leave it there. Agree to disagree.

I suspect Richard Gage is an Operative just as Steve Jones is. Perhaps we will see in the fullness of time. They are being used to "mop up" the people who don't buy the official story. They have done quite a good job.
dark star
Member
#374 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 19:59
Reply 
Desdichado:
Prince William?

Its Willy,s birthday today........hooray !
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#375 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 20:04 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
post deleted Starseed, I said Agree to disagree, leave it there.
 Page:  ««  1  2  3  ...  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®