RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

CONTACTEES

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  21  22  23  24  25  ...  28  29  »» 
PoppyMeze
Member
#331 | Posted: 20 Jun 2011 13:45
Reply 
Sorry previous post got typos - tried to edit - won't let me - I do this every stinkin' time!!!
PoppyMeze
Member
#332 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 09:09
Reply 
PoppyMeze:
Sorry previous post got typos - tried to edit - won't let me - I do this every stinkin' time!!!

Ah I see - slight time-delay but why can't I just delete the post in edit?
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#333 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 12:08
Reply 
Read Professor John Mack's books. This is a real physical phenomenon.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#334 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 12:13 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
PoppyMeze:
Did no one think to run a DNA test on her baby son?

Would you care to pay for this? Send us the money and we'll get one done. Several thousand pounds. As simple paternity test would not suffice. You would need a detailed genetic analysis to see if any "tampering" has been introduced. Men often have sperm removed. This is done by shoving an implement up their back passage and retrieving sperm that way. I have known abductees who have had this happen. One I know who is a highly credible, stable married man.

Derrel Simms was supposed to be doing this kind of testing on abductees, I have not heard of any results however. Having said that I think he was just doing simple maternity or paternity testing. It needs to be a full genetic screen.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#335 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 12:25
Reply 
You must not treat all evidence as if is to be accepted in a court. That is the hardest way to get to the truth.

Imagine you are a cop trying to solve a crime. Somebody says to you - a guy in the park told me the name of the person who did the murder. Would you ignore that man because his evidence would not be accepted in court because it is heresay. Of course you wouldn't. You would carry out further lines of enquiry to find more solid evidence. ALL leads must be taken into account. The regression is part of this. The same information comes out again and again from literally thousands of abductees. Do you ignore this because it's not admissible in a court. Of course not, you use it to build a picture and solve the crime.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#336 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 12:28
Reply 
I have quite a lot of footage to air on the show of abductees giving their accounts. It's very interesting. Probably air in a few months time. I would imagine there will be two shows covering it.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#337 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 12:33 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
It is my bet that if academia was sponsored by central government funding to run detailed genetic tests of a large group of abductees and their offspring the results would basically prove they have been adjusted. It would be game set and match and the abduction phenomenon would be conclusively proved to be real.

But this kind of investigation would cost hundreds of thousands and would need to be sanctioned by authorities who are controlled by a hidden hierarchy that would never allow this to happen.

The motives behind the genetics programme, which our military have no control over, is probably the real reason for the UFO cover up.
Starseed
Guest
#338 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 12:38 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
Read Professor John Mack's books. This is a real physical phenomenon.

If it is, then why has nobody in this day and age been able to get any footage at all of the abductions?

A neighbour at the end of the street with a camera permanently recording the house each night?

Cameras in the garden, hidden around (cheap ones from aldi LOL).

Put cameras on neighbours houses trained on your bedroom window?

I find it hard to believe that no one has captured anything in thousands of abductions.

So what does that tell the police detective?
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#339 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 13:24 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
You obviously haven't read the books, nor listened to the interview. They are one step ahead of us in all our technologies. People have rigged up systems only to find their equipment fails. They know when our technology is monitoring them, which is why it is done the way it is. Generally in remote locations.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#340 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 13:27 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Same applies to animal mutilations. Read Tony Dodds book, where a group of farmers did exactly what you suggest. They set up cameras and infra red sensing equipment in a field that was having mutilations and a camera triggered once. The following morning a few yards from where they were (and had been all night, they staked out the field - a group of them), they discovered a mutilated sheep, they couldn't understand it. There was nothing on the camera. You can't just ignore that type of evidence. It proves they are one step ahead of our sensing technology. They come and go with impunity and know how to avoid our cameras.

You are making the mistake many people do when dealing with this evidence. You are only considering solutions to the evidence which you yourself have experienced or read about. We are dealing with something that has not been revealed to the public at large. Something more advanced than we have any experience of.

LOL
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#341 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 13:30 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
I am seeking scientific assistance from geneticists to carry out testing. What are you doing?
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#342 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 13:38 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Starseed:
captured anything in thousands of abductions.

Implants, scoop marks, triangular marks, bruises, people being returned to the wrong house!, thousands of cases on record. They know how to interfere with/ avoid cameras, the same way they can put you under from a long distance. I have met a lot of self claimed abductees. They are ordinary people. You will learn a lot when I put out the interviews of them giving their accounts. Mary Rodwell has helped over 1,700 people affected by this phenomenon. I met her last year, she is a very down to earth researcher. People like her are not wasting their lives on people making things up. Real people with real experiences on the shitty end of an extremely emotionally painful situation.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#343 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 14:13
Reply 
The evidence taken as a whole from many reliable people suggests there is a real physical programme of some sort.

More and better evidence is needed I agree. But the search for better evidence requires specialist skills and technology and a lot of money. I gave just one example that of sophisticated genetic testing of thousands of alleged abductees.

Other research projects would involve advanced surveillance techniques. (not cameras from aldi - ha ha). But again this requires real funding.

It is my belief that certain groups within the military and NASA monitor UFO activity and know about abduction.

BUT here is the problem. They have decided long ago the whole thing is to be covered up, played down and ridiculed. The power structure we have prevents any serious research into any of these areas. The nearest independent research was by NIDS. But I believe NIDS was infiltrated and was in fact being ran to some degree by the U.S. government.

Even people like Dr. Roger Leir cannot get any funds to carry out research despite his catalogue of implants which show advanced technology connecting/interfacing with nerve endings for christ sake. These implants interface with nerve endings. This is very advanced, and he can't get a penny to carry out research??? What does that tell you. It tells you the system cannot fund this research because they already know what he has found and they know it must be kept from the public.

So it is catch 22. I agree people want more evidence, but to get it is difficult because their agenda is covert and those holding the purse strings want it kept hushed up.
Starseed
Guest
#344 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 14:37 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
So - many people have tried to capture evidence - but, because aliens are so advanced, they make sure that they are never caught on film.

Roger Lear has implants that connect to nerve endings? Now that sounds like solid proof of something. Without examination it is a catch 22 I agree. Pity.


My Mum talks to aliens (Full Documentary)

This video is great.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#345 | Posted: 21 Jun 2011 14:44 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Starseed:
Now that sounds like solid proof of something

Correct, it is. We need to find ways of finding more evidence and getting funding to further the scientific investigation outside of government organisations. This is why I put out the appeal in the TV show. I have had scientists contact me wanting to help. There will be another appeal soon. We need to get a geneticist on board along with the other scientists I already had help from.

The physical proof may well come from genetic testing.
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  21  22  23  24  25  ...  28  29  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®