RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

HIDDEN TECHNOLOGY

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  46  47  48  49  50  ...  97  98  »» 
Starseed
Guest
#706 | Posted: 9 Nov 2010 18:05
Reply 
It is a fact, there is overwhelming evidence of it`s use. It seems to be a 'directed' weapon though and I don`t think it has anything to do with the broadcasted 15000Hz stuff.
dreamkatcher
Member
#707 | Posted: 9 Nov 2010 18:18
Reply 
Just a thought.
Starseed
Guest
#708 | Posted: 9 Nov 2010 18:22
Reply 
I did read all of it and looked up Medusa again. So I have refreshed the old grey matter on microwave weapons. None of this sort of info is ever wasted IMO.
dreamkatcher
Member
#709 | Posted: 9 Nov 2010 18:49
Reply 
Starseed
Guest
#710 | Posted: 9 Nov 2010 19:44
Reply 
She did mention signals being transmitted through computers on the latest Starship ( the interview) I suppose that if Miles Johnston works for Sky (?) he would know (or would be in a position to find out) about the mysterious signals????? Dan, dan, daaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiGvBwO36BM

Another shameless plug for truth and information...
dreamkatcher
Member
#711 | Posted: 9 Nov 2010 21:33
Reply 
Active Denial System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Similar to the same way that a microwave oven heats food, the millimeter ....
Others have focused on concerns that weapons whose operative principle is that
...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System - 75k - Similar pages
Directed-energy weapon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wired News article "Weapons Freeze, Microwave Enemies" (and copied in at ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon - 90k - Similar pages
HOMEMADE MICROWAVE WEAPONS - Global Guerrillas

19 May 2004 ... The US military is hard at work designing, building, and using directed energy
weapons (HERFs -- high energy radio frequency or microwave ...
globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2004/05/journal_homemad.html - 68k - Similar pages
Microwave Weapons Against US Citizens

Washington - Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave devices should be
used on American citizens in crowd-control situations before they are used on
...
www.viewzone.com/microwave.html - 12k - Similar pages
MICROWAVE WEAPON

Directed energy weapons are among the high-tech arms of the century. They hurt
and kill with electromagnetic power. Microwave weapons can be aimed at ...
www.klimaforschung.net/Dr._Reinhard_Munzert/index.htm - 90k - Similar pages
High-power microwave (HPM) / E-Bomb

27 Apr 2005 ... Studies have examined the incorporation of a high power microwave weapon into
the weapons bay of a conceptual uninhabited combat aerial ...
www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/hpm.htm - 26k - Similar pages
Misuse of Microwave Weapons by Criminals and Terrorists

Describes the lethality of microwave weapons. With references and sources.
www.mikrowellenterror.de/english/ - 11k - Similar pages
Blackout Bomb: Air Force's High-Powered Microwave Weapons Fry ...

30 Jul 2009 ... An experimental stealth weapon could blind enemy surveillance.
www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-07/experimental-microwave-wea pon-could-fry-enemy-equipment - 85k - Similar pages
Sign in to read: Details of US microwave-weapon tests revealed ...

22 Jul 2005 ... VOLUNTEERS taking part in tests of the Pentagon's "less-lethal" microwave weapon
were banned from wearing glasses or contact lenses due to ...
www.newscientist.com/article/mg18725095.600-details-of-us-microwaveweapon-tests-revea led.html - 23k - Similar pages
YouTube - Microwave Weapons ( Raytheon Style )

22 Oct 2006 ... googlepolice ? Directed beam of microwave energy hits the burn pain nerves
making those protesters run for cover--Burn Baby Burn!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKlKhMbK468 - 119k - Similar pages
1 ‎2 ‎3 ‎4 ‎5 ‎6 ‎7 ‎8 ‎9 ‎10 ‎Next ‎
Starseed
Guest
#712 | Posted: 9 Nov 2010 21:40 | Edited by: Starseed
Reply 
Had a few views now, no answers...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiGvBwO36BM
jamesvoyce
Member
#713 | Posted: 10 Nov 2010 23:24
Reply 
I have had some feedback off the professor that did the "lifter thing".I asked if he could at least build a partial vaccum to prove less lift,which would totally prove that it is not anti gravity.you were right Richard,a total vaccum is hard to do,yet a partial,if any vaccum would surely show less lift.
Either way,whatever the results,there is still a possibility that alien craft use anti gravity and then switch to this method for maybe their probes?
The RAF Woodbridge case showed a glowing craft with electical disturbance,plus silent engines...like i said,sounds familiar!!

I'm not sure..as it doesn't explain the phenominal acceleration and speed of ufo's,which only anti gravity would demonstrate.

Who's thinkin with me?
ImOverHere
Member
#714 | Posted: 10 Nov 2010 23:36
Reply 
What about the reported instantaneous changes of direction of UFOs at 1000s mph? . All so called "anti gravity" devices in videos have only ever just wobbled upwards.
jamesvoyce
Member
#715 | Posted: 10 Nov 2010 23:51
Reply 
Thats what i mean "im over here"maybe it is two seperate things...maybe it is the difference between real ufos and the military?
I am starting to think that the high voltage lifters are related to the anti gravity devices,maybe it is our attempt to replicate them.
I am no expert but your 1000 mph seems a little slow..my first sighting(which is probably a real one) was at least 10 times faster than a tornado jet at full throttle,thats 20,000 miles per hour at least...and the major reason i am here.
I know this because when i was in the army,Tornado jets flew above my base every single day,and these were state of the art at the time.

Heres a little extra nugget though..two months before anyone knew about Iraq invading Kuwait,they had desert camaflauge added.Future tellers?i dont think so.
ImOverHere
Member
#716 | Posted: 11 Nov 2010 00:17
Reply 
I dont think UFOs use anti-gravity drive, I tend to err towards some kind distortion of time induced forces used to propel / suck things through space but I'm only guessing.
jamesvoyce
Member
#717 | Posted: 11 Nov 2010 00:23
Reply 
That sounds like anti gravity lol.Yet a lot of the probes seem to be electical..the only thing that could propel craft like what i have seen and most of the population is some form of anti gravity,yet we have this elecrtical effect...
That is what bothers me...it doesn't make sense...
ImOverHere
Member
#718 | Posted: 11 Nov 2010 00:34
Reply 
It cannot be any type of coventional drive using equal and opposite force reaction because the expulsion of a massive tonnage of detectable matter would be required. When I say time distortion it has got be directional not governed by the proximity of mass and its associated gravity effect.
Starseed
Guest
#719 | Posted: 11 Nov 2010 07:30
Reply 
It could be like Fred Flintstones car. They put their feet through the bottom and run quickly?
ImOverHere
Member
#720 | Posted: 11 Nov 2010 09:52 | Edited by: ImOverHere
Reply 
That would be an equal and opposite reaction to the force applied by feet. Definatly not capablie of propelling vehicles at the velocities reported. This discussion warrants serious comment and explanation.
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  46  47  48  49  50  ...  97  98  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®