RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.  THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.<br>
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added.  This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons. www.richplanet.net community built on miniBB / RICHPLANET.NET FORUM : WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
There is still no decision on whether new members will be added. This can only happen when suitable moderators are in place, who are not easy to find for obvious reasons.
/

HIDDEN TECHNOLOGY

 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  9  10  11  12  13  ...  97  98  »» 
Starseed
Guest
#151 | Posted: 31 Jan 2010 09:30
Reply 
Well they are on here:

RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#152 | Posted: 31 Jan 2010 10:39 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
According to Lazar, they have not made the correct isotope of 115 which is used in the fuel.

I think it probably has more neutrons than the ones they have managed to produce.

Also - how do you know they haven't made it and are suppresing it. They suppress lots of other stuff quite successfully. The worlds Universities are controlled by governments, in turn controlled by intelligence.
Joe
Member
#153 | Posted: 31 Jan 2010 19:59
Reply 
Thats just it!, how can any of us know what's really going on?
Joe
Member
#154 | Posted: 31 Jan 2010 20:03 | Edited by: Joe
Reply 
Explore key information about the chemical elements through this periodic table Group 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Period
1 1
H 2
He
2 3
Li 4
Be 5
B 6
C 7
N 8
O 9
F 10
Ne
3 11
Na 12
Mg 13
Al 14
Si 15
P 16
S 17
Cl 18
Ar
4 19
K 20
Ca 21
Sc 22
Ti 23
V 24
Cr 25
Mn 26
Fe 27
Co 28
Ni 29
Cu 30
Zn 31
Ga 32
Ge 33
As 34
Se 35
Br 36
Kr
5 37
Rb 38
Sr 39
Y 40
Zr 41
Nb 42
Mo 43
Tc 44
Ru 45
Rh 46
Pd 47
Ag 48
Cd 49
In 50
Sn 51
Sb 52
Te 53
I 54
Xe
6 55
Cs 56
Ba * 71
Lu 72
Hf 73
Ta 74
W 75
Re 76
Os 77
Ir 78
Pt 79
Au 80
Hg 81
Tl 82
Pb 83
Bi 84
Po 85
At 86
Rn
7 87
Fr 88
Ra ** 103
Lr 104
Rf 105
Db 106
Sg 107
Bh 108
Hs 109
Mt 110
Ds 111
Rg 112
Cn 113
Uut 114
Uuq 115
Uup 116
Uuh 117
Uus 118
Starseed
Guest
#155 | Posted: 1 Feb 2010 19:30
Reply 
Have you changed your mind now Rich? AGW?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N29w-QFHhw
Starseed
Guest
#156 | Posted: 1 Feb 2010 19:36
Reply 
I mean - this guy is proving his point without question. Especially since the climategate & subsequent revelations...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zOXmJ4jd-8

I`m sure we are all more or less in aggreement on here are we not?

c02 follows temp, not the other way round. I mean 1 volcano going off for eg. produces more co2 than every human on earth for a whole year. It`s plainly ridiculous.

And the only reliable temp records are from the satellites... Which prove Monktons points?
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#157 | Posted: 1 Feb 2010 19:49
Reply 
I've never been totally convinced either way about global warming.

However, burning fossil fuels is bad because it releases poison (CO2) into the atmosphere. If you breathed nothing but CO2 you would die. We have increased the amount of CO2 from the industrial revolution by 40%, this is bad whether is casuses warming or not. We have fundamentally changed the concentration of one of the constituent gases that surround our planet. We have changed a natural system we do not fully understand.

If we have technology (free energy) to stop doing this - it should be introduced.
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#158 | Posted: 1 Feb 2010 19:51
Reply 
I have studised several graphs of CO2 and T over hundreds of thousands of years. The graphs I saw seem inconsistent. Some changes T seems to follow CO2 and others CO2 follows T???

I could not come to a conclusion which one is the leader.

Got any graphs?
Starseed
Guest
#159 | Posted: 1 Feb 2010 20:00
Reply 
RICHPLANET.NET:
Got any graphs?

Watch that Monckton vid - all the graphs one could ever need are on it.

To think that we 'we' have changed the earths temp by any more than a purely marginal ammount is playing right into ed (bullshitter) millibands hands. That guy can`t lie straight in bed.

When yellowstone goes up - and it will - I think 'we' will then realise how little impact we truly have on global temps.

I do think they are hiding zero point energy tech though - and THAT I hope 'we' can expose and use. That will stop global control in one swoop too. + many of the other massive benefits.

Cheers chap!
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#160 | Posted: 1 Feb 2010 20:42
Reply 
Haven't watched Monktons whole talk, but I will.

Cheers
Starseed
Guest
#161 | Posted: 6 Feb 2010 11:16
Reply 
Physicist Discovers How to Teleport Energy

First, they teleported photons, then atoms and ions. Now one physicist has worked out how to do it with energy, a technique that has profound implications for the future of physics.

In 1993, Charlie Bennett at IBM's Watson Research Center in New York State and a few pals showed how to transmit quantum information from one point in space to another without traversing the intervening space.

The technique relies on the strange quantum phenomenon called entanglement, in which two particles share the same existence. This deep connection means that a measurement on one particle immediately influences the other, even though they are light-years apart. Bennett and company worked out how to exploit this to send information. (The influence between the particles may be immediate, but the process does not violate relativity because some informatiom has to be sent classically at the speed of light.) They called the technique teleportation.

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24759/

Sounds like bullshit to me - any ideas?
RICHPLANET.NET
Admin
#162 | Posted: 6 Feb 2010 14:54 | Edited by: RICHPLANET.NET
Reply 
Could this article be the start of BBC shiftingv their stance.

If you watch their propoganda TV productions of the past they never speak like this. Up until now they have sold global warming as an absolute fact. It's ironic the BBC conducting poles of public oipinion, when they are the ones that create the opinions in the public in the first place.

BBC Link - Opinions Changing
Starseed
Guest
#163 | Posted: 7 Feb 2010 08:53
Reply 
They still lace the crap with snippets like this:

"Action is urgently needed," Professor Watson warned. "

"We need the public to understand that climate change is serious so they will change their habits and help us move towards a low carbon economy."

We must educate the non-believers shite...

However - I think it was me that said that there is going to be a drip drip drip of stories that lead to a 180 turn in the lies. I think they`ve realised that they can`t get away with it much longer, so blame the science and cut and run - slowly mind you, so the sheep don`t realise....

we`re gonna see more and more of this, drip, drip, drip.....
monkeyboy
Member
#164 | Posted: 7 Feb 2010 17:33
Reply 
pt3 of the theory behind the norway spiral. interesting theory imo.

http://www.enterprisemission.com/Norway-Message3.htm
dark star
Member
#165 | Posted: 8 Feb 2010 19:51
Reply 
monkeyboy:
t3 of the theory behind the norway spiral. interesting theory imo.

Nice one MB,strange shit going on !
 Page:  ««  1  2  ...  9  10  11  12  13  ...  97  98  »» 
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Image Link  URL Link 

   
» Username  » Password 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please enter your login/password details upon posting a message, or sign up first
TO JOIN THIS FORUM: WE ARE NOT ADMITTING NEW MEMBERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME. THIS IS DUE TO PREVIOUS TROLLS ATTACKING THE FORUM.
We may be considering adding new members on a "block basis". We will collect new member requests and then introduce a new batch. The new memebrs will be identifiable by a prefix in their username as a "new member". Anyone considered to be trolling or causing trouble will be immedialtey removed. To be put on the list please email richard@richplanet.net AND GIVE YOUR US NAME, A USERNAME, PASSWORD. I would imagine a new batch of new members will be added in January 2012.
 

Forums are powered by miniBB®